Evaluation of life cycle energy, economy and CO2 emissions for biomass chemical looping gasification to power generation

Usama Mohamed,Ying-jie Zhao,Qun Yi,Li-juan Shi,Guo-qing Wei,William Nimmo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.05.067
IF: 8.7
2021-10-01
Renewable Energy
Abstract:<p>A life cycle energy use, CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and cost input evaluation of a 650 MW Biomass Chemical Looping Gasification Combined Cycle (BCLGCC) and a Biomass/Coal Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (BIGCC/CIGCC) power generation plants with and without (w/o) CO<sub>2</sub> capture &amp; storage (CCS) are analysed. These were then compared to coal/biomass combustion technologies. The life cycle evaluation covers the whole power generation process including biomass/coal supply chain, electricity generation at the power plant and the CCS process. Gasification power plants showed lower energy input and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, yet higher costs compared to combustion power plants. Coal power plants illustrated lower energy and cost input; however higher CO<sub>2</sub> emissions compared to biomass power plants. Coal CCS plants can reduce CO<sub>2</sub> emissions to near zero, while BCLGCC and BIGCC plants with CCS resulted in negative 680 kg-CO<sub>2</sub>/MWh and 769 kg-CO<sub>2</sub>/MWh, respectively, which is due to the higher biomass utilization efficiency for BCLGCC compared to BIGCC hence less CO<sub>2</sub> captured and stored. Regarding the total life cycle costs input (TLCCI), BCLGCC with and without CCS equal to 149.3 £/MWh and 199.6 £/MWh, and the total life cycle energy input (TLCEI) for both with and without CCS is equal to 2162 MJ/MWh and 1765 MJ/MWh, respectively.</p>
energy & fuels,green & sustainable science & technology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?