Abstract:Background: The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine has prompted the development of numerous ethical guidelines, while the involvement of patients in the creation of these documents lags behind. As part of the European PROFID project we explore patient perspectives on the ethical implications of AI in care for patients at increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Aim: Explore perspectives of patients on the ethical use of AI, particularly in clinical decision-making regarding the implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Methods: Semi-structured, future scenario-based interviews were conducted among patients who had either an ICD and/or a heart condition with increased risk of SCD in Germany (n = 9) and the Netherlands (n = 15). We used the principles of the European Commission's Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI to structure the interviews. Results: Six themes arose from the interviews: the ability of AI to rectify human doctors' limitations; the objectivity of data; whether AI can serve as second opinion; AI explainability and patient trust; the importance of the 'human touch'; and the personalization of care. Overall, our results reveal a strong desire among patients for more personalized and patient-centered care in the context of ICD implantation. Participants in our study express significant concerns about the further loss of the 'human touch' in healthcare when AI is introduced in clinical settings. They believe that this aspect of care is currently inadequately recognized in clinical practice. Participants attribute to doctors the responsibility of evaluating AI recommendations for clinical relevance and aligning them with patients' individual contexts and values, in consultation with the patient. Conclusion: The 'human touch' patients exclusively ascribe to human medical practitioners extends beyond sympathy and kindness, and has clinical relevance in medical decision-making. Because this cannot be replaced by AI, we suggest that normative research into the 'right to a human doctor' is needed. Furthermore, policies on patient-centered AI integration in clinical practice should encompass the ethics of everyday practice rather than only principle-based ethics. We suggest that an empirical ethics approach grounded in ethnographic research is exceptionally well-suited to pave the way forward.

AI & robotics briefing: 'Risk-of-death' AI save lives in hospital trial

Artificial, but is it intelligent?

Ethical use of artificial intelligence to prevent sudden cardiac death: an interview study of patient perspectives

An Artificial Intelligence Copilot System Helps Reduce Mortality Rates of Hemodialysis Patients

Artificial intelligence in cardiac surgery: A systematic review

Novel ways of applying artificial intelligence in emergency medicine - literature review

Abstract 15139: Applying an Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiographic System for Reducing Mortality: A Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial

How artificial intelligence could transform emergency care

AI & robotics briefing: There's a 5% risk that AI will wipe out humanity

Artificial intelligence powers digital medicine

Abstract 350: Measuring the Return on Investment of an Artificial Intelligence (AI) Early Warning System

Artificial Intelligence: Predicting Perioperative Problems

Equity in Using Artificial Intelligence Mortality Predictions to Target Goals of Care Documentation

Artificial intelligence meets medical robotics

Forget about replacing doctors with AI—ȷust get our computers to work

Next-Gen Surgery: AI Robots Leading the Way in Healthcare

Artificial intelligence (AI) for neurologists: do digital neurones dream of electric sheep?

Rams, hounds and white boxes: Investigating human-AI collaboration protocols in medical diagnosis

A Call to Address AI “Hallucinations” and How Healthcare Professionals Can Mitigate Their Risks

The robot butler: How and why should we study predictive algorithms and artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare?

Integrating artificial intelligence into healthcare systems: more than just the algorithm