Abstract:BACKGROUND The digitization and automation of diagnostics and treatments promise to alter the quality of health care and improve patient outcomes, while undersupply of medical personnel, high workload on medical professionals, and medical case complexity increase. Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) have been proven to help medical professionals in their everyday work through their ability to process vast amounts of patient information. Still, a comprehensive adoption is partially disrupted by specific technological or personal characteristics. With the rise of artificial intelligence (AI), CDSS become adaptive technologies with human-like capabilities, able to learn and destined to change their characteristics over time. Yet, research has not reflected on the characteristics and factors essential for effective collaboration between human actors and AI-enabled CDSS. OBJECTIVE Our study seeks to summarize the factors influencing an effective collaboration between medical professionals and AI-enabled CDSS. These factors are essential for medical professionals, management, and technology designers to reflect on the adoption, implementation, and development of AI-enabled CDSS. METHODS We conducted a literature review including three different meta-databases, screening over 1000 articles and including 101 of them for full-text assessment. In the end, seven met our inclusion criteria and were analyzed for our synthesis. RESULTS We identified the technological characteristics and human factors that appear to have an essential effect on the collaboration of medical professionals and AI-enabled CDSS in accordance with our research objective, namely training data quality, performance, explainability, adaptability, medical expertise, technological expertise, personality, cognitive biases, and trust. Comparing our results with those from research on non-AI CDSS, some characteristics/factors retain their importance, while others gain or lose relevance due to the uniqueness of human-AI interaction. However, only a few studies mention theoretical foundations and patient outcomes related to AI-enabled CDSS. CONCLUSIONS Our study provides a comprehensive overview of relevant characteristics and factors that influence the interaction and collaboration of medical professionals and AI-enabled CDSS. Rather limited theoretical foundations are currently hindering the possibility of creating adequate concepts and models to explain and predict interrelations between these characteristics and factors. For an appropriate evaluation of human-AI collaboration, patient outcomes and the role of patients within the decision-making process should be taken into consideration. CLINICALTRIAL

Rams, hounds and white boxes: Investigating human-AI collaboration protocols in medical diagnosis

Studying human-AI collaboration protocols: the case of the Kasparov’s law in radiological double reading

Who Goes First? Influences of Human-AI Workflow on Decision Making in Clinical Imaging

Experimental evidence of effective human–AI collaboration in medical decision-making

Enhancing human-AI collaboration: The case of colonoscopy

Human-AI Collaboration in Large Language Model-Assisted Brain MRI Differential Diagnosis: A Usability Study

Heterogeneity and predictors of the effects of AI assistance on radiologists

Human-AI Teaming in Critical Care: A Comparative Analysis of Data Scientists' and Clinicians' Perspectives on AI Augmentation and Automation

"It depends": Configuring AI to Improve Clinical Usefulness Across Contexts

Factors that influence the adoption of human-AI collaboration in clinical decision-making

AI-clinician collaboration via disagreement prediction: A decision pipeline and retrospective analysis of real-world radiologist-AI interactions

Human–Machine Collaboration in Diagnostics: Exploring the Synergy in Clinical Imaging with Artificial Intelligence

Painting the black box white: experimental findings from applying XAI to an ECG reading setting

"Hello AI": Uncovering the Onboarding Needs of Medical Practitioners for Human-AI Collaborative Decision-Making

Human-AI collectives produce the most accurate differential diagnoses

Rethinking Human-AI Collaboration in Complex Medical Decision Making: A Case Study in Sepsis Diagnosis

Combining Human Expertise with Artificial Intelligence: Experimental Evidence from Radiology

A Human-AI Collaborative Approach for Clinical Decision Making on Rehabilitation Assessment

Embracing the future—is artificial intelligence already better? A comparative study of artificial intelligence performance in diagnostic accuracy and decision‐making

Human, All Too Human? An All-Around Appraisal of the “Artificial Intelligence Revolution” in Medical Imaging

Human Factors and Technological Characteristics Influencing the Interaction with AI-enabled Clinical Decision Support Systems: A Literature Review (Preprint)