Abstract:Children achieve better long‐term language outcomes than adults. However, it remains unclear whether children actually learn language more quickly than adults during real‐time exposure to input—indicative of true superior language learning abilities—or whether this advantage stems from other factors. To examine this issue, we compared the rate at which children (8–10 years) and adults extracted a novel, hidden linguistic rule, in which novel articles probabilistically predicted the animacy of associated nouns (e.g., "gi lion"). Participants categorized these two‐word phrases according to a second, explicitly instructed rule over two sessions, separated by an overnight delay. Both children and adults successfully learned the hidden animacy rule through mere exposure to the phrases, showing slower response times and decreased accuracy to occasional phrases that violated the rule. Critically, sensitivity to the hidden rule emerged much more quickly in children than adults; children showed a processing cost for violation trials from very early on in learning, whereas adults did not show reliable sensitivity to the rule until the second session. Children also showed superior generalization of the hidden animacy rule when asked to classify nonword trials (e.g., "gi badupi") according to the hidden animacy rule. Children and adults showed similar retention of the hidden rule over the delay period. These results provide insight into the nature of the critical period for language, suggesting that children have a true advantage over adults in the rate of implicit language learning. Relative to adults, children more rapidly extract hidden linguistic structures during real‐time language exposure. Research Highlights Children and adults both succeeded in implicitly learning a novel, uninstructed linguistic rule, based solely on exposure to input. Children learned the novel linguistic rules much more quickly than adults. Children showed better generalization performance than adults when asked to apply the novel rule to nonsense words without semantic content. Results provide insight into the nature of critical period effects in language, indicating that children have an advantage over adults in real‐time language learning.

Know thy audience: Children teach basic or complex facts depending on the learner's maturity

Children's Selective Teaching and Informing: A Meta‐Analysis

Young children can infer information preferences from goals and recommend appropriate sources to others.

On a need‐to‐know basis: Young children distinguish conventional and privileged information

Children’s selective information sharing based on the recipient’s role

Young Children's Directed Question Asking in Preschool Classrooms

Approximating the ZPD? Young children's judgements of appropriate task level for learning

Toddlers do not preferentially transmit generalizable information to others

Infants' Understanding of Information Transmission in the Context of Communication Involving Multiple Agents

Adults' learning of complex explanations violates their intuitions about optimal explanatory order

Preschoolers' information search strategies: Inefficient but adaptive

Young children's sensitivity to listener knowledge and perceptual context in choosing referring expressions

Knowledge and source type influence children's skepticism of misinformation

Adapting syntax in writing to varying audiences as a function of age and social cognitive ability

How mothers teach basic-level and situation-restricted count nouns

Children adapt their information search to goal and statistical structure of a problem

A Tale of Age and Abilities: Analyzing Narrative Macrostructure Development in Chinese Preschoolers Through the Lens of Story Grammar

Children extract a new linguistic rule more quickly than adults

Children With More Uncertainty in Their Intuitive Theories Seek Domain-Relevant Information

Functional learning among children, adolescents, and young adults

Children's sensitivity to the conventionality of sources