Abstract:Networks of neurons can generate oscillatory activity as result of various types of coupling that lead to synchronization. A prominent type of oscillatory activity is gamma (30-80 Hz) rhythms, which may play an important role in neuronal information processing. Two mechanisms have mainly been proposed for their generation: (1) interneuron network gamma (ING) and (2) pyramidal-interneuron network gamma (PING). In vitro and in vivo experiments have shown that both mechanisms can exist in the same cortical circuits. This raises the questions: How do ING and PING interact when both can in principle occur? Are the network dynamics a superposition, or do ING and PING interact in a nonlinear way and if so, how? In this article, we first generalize the phase representation for nonlinear one-dimensional pulse coupled oscillators as introduced by Mirollo and Strogatz to type II oscillators whose phase response curve (PRC) has zero crossings. We then give a full theoretical analysis for the regular gamma-like oscillations of simple networks consisting of two neural oscillators, an "E neuron" mimicking a synchronized group of pyramidal cells, and an "I neuron" representing such a group of interneurons. Motivated by experimental findings, we choose the E neuron to have a type I PRC [leaky integrate-and-fire (LIF) neuron], while the I neuron has either a type I or type II PRC (LIF or "sine" neuron). The phase representation allows us to define in a simple manner scenarios of interaction between the two neurons, which are independent of the types and the details of the neuron models. The presence of delay in the couplings leads to an increased number of scenarios relevant for gamma-like oscillatory patterns. We analytically derive the set of such scenarios and describe their occurrence in terms of parameter values such as synaptic connectivity and drive to the E and I neurons. The networks can be tuned to oscillate in an ING or PING mode. We focus particularly on the transition region where both rhythms compete to govern the network dynamics and compare with oscillations in reduced networks, which can only generate either ING or PING. Our analytically derived oscillation frequency diagrams indicate that except for small coexistence regions, the networks generate ING if the oscillation frequency of the reduced ING network exceeds that of the reduced PING network, and vice versa. For networks with the LIF I neuron, the network oscillation frequency slightly exceeds the frequencies of corresponding reduced networks, while it lies between them for networks with the sine I neuron. In networks oscillating in ING (PING) mode, the oscillation frequency responds faster to changes in the drive to the I (E) neuron than to changes in the drive to the E (I) neuron. This finding suggests a method to analyze which mechanism governs an observed network oscillation. Notably, also when the network operates in ING mode, the E neuron can spike before the I neuron such that relative spike times of the pyramidal cells and the interneurons alone are not conclusive for distinguishing ING and PING.

The type II phase resetting curve is optimal for stochastic synchrony

Type-II phase resetting curve is optimal for stochastic synchrony

Power and Phase Properties of Oscillatory Neural Responses in the Presence of Background Activity

Effects of synaptic coupling on phase response curve of neurons

Neuromodulatory effects on synchrony and network reorganization in networks of coupled Kuramoto oscillators

Adjoint Method for Macroscopic Phase-Resetting Curves of Generic Spiking Neural Networks

Experimentally Estimating Phase Response Curves of Neurons: Theoretical and Practical Issues

Synchrony in Networks of Type 2 Interneurons Is More Robust to Noise with Hyperpolarizing Inhibition Compared to Shunting Inhibition in Both the Stochastic Population Oscillator and the Coupled Oscillator Regimes

Noise-induced synchrony of two-neuron motifs with asymmetric noise and uneven coupling

Existence and Stability Criteria for Global Synchrony and for Synchrony in two Alternating Clusters of Pulse-Coupled Oscillators Updated to Include Conduction Delays

Analyzing the competition of gamma rhythms with delayed pulse-coupled oscillators in phase representation

Phase Response Curve Analysis of a Full Morphological Globus Pallidus Neuron Model Reveals Distinct Perisomatic and Dendritic Modes of Synaptic Integration

How stochastic synchrony could work in cerebellar Purkinje cells

Phase Response Synchronization In Neuronal Population With Time-Varying Coupling Strength

Optimal phase-selective entrainment of electrochemical oscillators with different phase response curves

Paradoxical phase response of gamma rhythms facilitates their entrainment in heterogeneous networks

Robustness of Diversity Induced Synchronization Transition in a Delayed Small-World Neuronal Network

Stochastic Resonance in Small-World Neuronal Networks with Hybrid Electrical–chemical Synapses

On the Phase Relationship Between Excitatory and Inhibitory Neurons in Oscillation

In-Phase Burst Synchronization and Rhythm Dynamics of Complex Neuronal Networks.