Neuromodulatory effects on synchrony and network reorganization in networks of coupled Kuramoto oscillators

Sinan Aktay,Leonard M. Sander,Michal Zochowski
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.27.582261
2024-02-28
Abstract:Neuromodulatory processes in the brain can critically change signal processing on a cellular level leading to dramatic changes in network level reorganization. Here, we use coupled non-identical Kuramoto oscillators to investigate how changes in the shape of phase response curves from Type 1 to Type 2, mediated by varying ACh levels, coupled with activity dependent plasticity may alter network reorganization. We first show that when plasticity is absent, the Type 1 networks, as expected, exhibit asynchronous dynamics with oscillators of the highest natural frequency robustly evolving faster in terms of their phase dynamics. At the same time, the Type 2 networks synchronize, with oscillators locked so that the ones with higher natural frequency have a constant phase lead as compared to the ones with lower natural frequency. This relationship establishes a robust mapping between the frequency and oscillators’ phases in the network, leading to structure/frequency mapping when plasticity is present. Further we show that while connection plasticity can produce stable synchrony (so called splay states) in Type 1 networks, the structure/frequency reorganization observed in Type 2 networks is not present.
Neuroscience
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper aims to explore how the neuromodulatory process affects the synchrony and network reorganization in a network of coupled Kuramoto oscillators. Specifically, the study focuses on how changing the phase - response curve (PRC) from type 1 to type 2, as well as activity - dependent synaptic plasticity (such as that mediated by changes in acetylcholine levels), alters the network reorganization pattern. By simulating non - homogeneous Kuramoto oscillator networks, the study examines the influence of different types of PRC on network dynamics in the absence and presence of synaptic plasticity. ### Main questions: 1. **The influence of neuromodulatory action on network synchrony and reorganization**: How does the study simulate the influence of neuromodulatory action (such as changes in acetylcholine levels) on network dynamics by changing the shape of the phase - response curve (PRC) from type 1 to type 2? 2. **The role of activity - dependent synaptic plasticity**: Explore how activity - dependent synaptic plasticity (such as STDP) further affects network synchrony and structural reorganization. ### Key findings: - **Network dynamics in the absence of synaptic plasticity**: - **Type 1 network**: It exhibits asynchronous dynamics, and the oscillators with the highest natural frequencies evolve faster in phase dynamics. - **Type 2 network**: It exhibits a synchronous state, and the oscillators with high natural frequencies have a constant phase lead relative to those with low natural frequencies. - **Network dynamics after the introduction of synaptic plasticity**: - **Type 1 network**: It can produce a stable synchronous state (referred to as the "dispersed state"), but no structural / frequency reorganization is observed. - **Type 2 network**: Synaptic plasticity leads to network structure / frequency reorganization, with the connections between high - natural - frequency oscillators and low - natural - frequency oscillators being strengthened, while the reverse connections are weakened. ### Research significance: - **Neuromodulatory action**: By changing the shape of the phase - response curve (PRC), the influence of changes in acetylcholine levels on neuronal excitability is simulated, thus revealing the important role of neuromodulation in brain function and disease. - **Synaptic plasticity**: Activity - dependent synaptic plasticity (such as STDP) not only affects network synchrony but also leads to network structure reorganization, which may be related to memory formation and cognitive functions. In conclusion, through theoretical models and numerical simulations, this paper deeply explores the influence of neuromodulatory action and synaptic plasticity on the dynamics and structure reorganization of neural networks, providing a new perspective for understanding the function of the brain in healthy and diseased states.