Abstract:Effective management and conservation of fishes requires understanding habitat use across multiple life stages while ensuring necessary habitats are both available and accessible. Tributary habitats may play an important role in recruitment and dispersal of fishes in anthropogenically modified rivers such as the Mississippi and Illinois Rivers of the Midwest U.S.A. Identifying source locations that contribute to recruitment of fish populations can determine the importance of connectivity within river networks and pinpoint critical habitats that sustain fish populations. In the Upper Mississippi River System (UMRS), the environments that fish use in early life stages (i.e., natal origin) can be identified using otolith trace element analysis due to stability and distinctness in water chemistry (strontium: calcium [Sr:Ca]) among water bodies that is reflected in otoliths. Here, we used trace element analysis to determine natal origin of six small‐bodied fishes including bullhead minnow (Pimephales vigilax), emerald shiner (Notropis atherinoides), gizzard shad (Dorosoma cepedianum), bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus), orangespotted sunfish (Lepomis humilis), and yellow perch (Perca flavescens) across six reaches of the UMRS (Pools 4, 8, 13, 26, the Open River of the Middle Mississippi River, and the La Grange Pool of the Illinois River). Otolith core Sr:Ca for fishes was quantified using laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Using the resulting Sr:Ca chemical signatures of otolith cores, natal origin (tributary, immigrant, or potential resident) was determined for individual fish based on family‐specific relationships between otolith and water chemistries. We found that all species originated from tributaries and other reaches (i.e., were immigrants) to varying extents, which acted as evidence for network connectivity. Specifically, tributaries contributed up to 48% of individuals at a given reach. In certain reaches, Pool 26 and the Open River reach, up to 80% of individuals in a species immigrated from another mainstem river reach. Network connectivity was also important in both upstream and downstream directions. Contributions from network connectivity varied among species: bullhead minnow used less whereas orangespotted sunfish used more network connectivity than when all species were combined. Further, the use of network connectivity varied spatially where individuals captured in Pool 8 and the La Grange Pool less often and those from Pool 26 and the Open River more often originated from network connectivity compared to the whole assemblage across reaches. These results indicate that species' life history traits probably interacted with the physical environment, which differs spatially, to yield observed recruitment source patterns. Our results show that network connectivity contributes to established assemblages of native small‐bodied fishes throughout the UMRS and underscore the role of interjurisdictional management in maintaining network connectivity to sustain fish populations.

Don't judge a nongame fish by its cover-age: an assessment of social media posts featuring Minnesota native fishes

From neglect toward enlightenment: the conservation of native fishes in the twenty-first century

Minnesota's Native Fish Bill: a case study in shifting the "rough fish paradigm"

Catching versus Counting: Comparing the Pro-Environmental Attitudes, Behaviors, and Climate Concerns of Recreational Fishers and Citizen Scientists

Alterations to water quality and quantity elicit similar stream fish functional trait responses in three North American rivers

Using social media to strengthen public awareness of wildlife conservation

Digital fisheries data in the Internet age: Emerging tools for research and monitoring using online data in recreational fisheries

Network connectivity contributes to native small‐bodied fish assemblages in the upper Mississippi River system

Empirical Assessments of the Type and Strength of Stream Fish Habitat Associations Can Advance Understanding of Functional Diversity and Promote Effective Conservation

Fishing for Fish Environmental DNA: Ecological Applications, Methodological Considerations, Surveying Designs, and Ways Forward

Food web perspectives and methods for riverine fish conservation

Strangers in a strange land; freshwater fish introductions, impacts, management and socio-ecological feedbacks in a small island nation – the case of Aotearoa New Zealand

Seasonal changes in fish eDNA signal vary between contrasting river types

Past and recent anthropogenic pressures drive rapid changes in riverine fish communities

Life and death in a dynamic environment: Invasive trout, floods, and intraspecific drivers of translocated populations

Do Management Actions to Restore Rare Habitat Benefit Native Fish Conservation? Distribution of Juvenile Native Fish Among Shoreline Habitats of the Colorado River

Assessing the value of citizen scientist observations in tracking the abundance of marine fishes

For the love of suckers: scientific benefits of engaging volunteers to monitor migrations and advocate for native non-game fishes

Examination of freshwater drum populations at the center of their latitudinal range: implications for development of diverse recreational angling opportunities

A new approach to define an economically important fish as an umbrella flagship species to enhance collaborative stakeholder-management agency habitat conservation

From tweets to tings: Dissimilarity in recorded species community between social media platforms and implications for resource-limited conservation