Abstract:figure legend Just as a tuning knob provides incremental adjustability that is easily accessible and readily reversible, replication slippage at tandem‐repetitive DNA provides a practically inexhaustible supply of abundant variation with minimal cost to fitness. This is an example of a 'mutation protocol', a genetic pattern implementing a bet‐hedging strategy against the ever‐present risk posed by environmental uncertainty – a function analogous to that provided by sexual reproduction. Constraints imposed by mutation protocols minimize risk so that mutations with a reasonable probability for beneficial effect can be more freely and abundantly produced. Mutation protocols can perhaps be best understood as the product of selection at the level of populations, although gene‐level selection may be adequate. Because the universe of possible DNA sequences is inconceivably vast, organisms have evolved mechanisms for exploring DNA sequence space while substantially reducing the hazard that would otherwise accrue to any process of random, accidental mutation. One such mechanism is meiotic recombination. Although sexual reproduction imposes a seemingly paradoxical 50% cost to fitness, sex evidently prevails because this cost is outweighed by the advantage of equipping offspring with genetic variation to accommodate environmental vicissitudes. The potential adaptive utility of additional mechanisms for producing genetic variation has long been obscured by a presumption that the vast majority of mutations are deleterious. Perhaps surprisingly, the probability for adaptive variation can be increased by several mechanisms that generate mutations abundantly. Such mechanisms, here called 'mutation protocols', implement implicit 'constraints that deconstrain'. Like meiotic recombination, they produce genetic variation in forms that minimize potential for harm while providing a reasonably high probability for benefit. One example is replication slippage of simple sequence repeats (SSRs); this process yields abundant, reversible mutations, typically with small quantitative effect on phenotype. This enables SSRs to function as adjustable 'tuning knobs'. There exists a clear pathway for SSRs to be shaped through indirect selection favouring their implicit tuning‐knob protocol. Several other molecular mechanisms comprise probable components of additional mutation protocols. Biologists might plausibly regard such mechanisms of mutation not primarily as sources of deleterious genetic mistakes but also as potentially adaptive processes for 'exploring' DNA sequence space.

Evolving a favorable distribution for mutation effects

Changing fitness effects of mutations through long-term bacterial evolution

A Case of Adaptation Through A Mutation in A Tandem Duplication During Experimental Evolution in Escherichia Coli

Modulation of Base Specific Mutation and Recombination Rates Enables Functional Adaptation within the Context of the Genetic Code

Interference Effects of Deleterious and Beneficial Mutations in Large Asexual Populations

Mutation protocols share with sexual reproduction the physiological role of producing genetic variation within 'constraints that deconstrain'

The Divergence of Mutation Rates and Spectra Across the Tree of Life.

A dynamical limit to evolutionary adaptation

Sequential mutations in exponentially growing populations

Clonal Interference, Multiple Mutations, and Adaptation in Large Asexual Populations

Spontaneous single-nucleotide substitutions and microsatellite mutations have distinct distributions of fitness effects

Mutation bias alters the distribution of fitness effects of mutations

Continuous evolution of user-defined genes at 1 million times the genomic mutation rate

The Effect of Recurrent Mutations on Genetic Diversity in a Large Population of Varying Size

Beneficial mutation-selection balance and the effect of linkage on positive selection

Overdominant Mutations Restrict Adaptive Loss of Heterozygosity at Linked Loci

From Drift to Draft: How Much Do Beneficial Mutations Actually Contribute to Predictions of Ohta’s Slightly Deleterious Model of Molecular Evolution?

Rapidly reversible mutations generate subclonal genetic diversity and reversible drug resistance

A Rapidly Reversible Mutation Generates Subclonal Genetic Diversity and Unstable Drug Resistance

Estimating the proportion of beneficial mutations that are not adaptive in mammals

The Rate of Adaptation in Large Sexual Populations with Linear Chromosomes