Abstract:Background: In any natural population, mutation is the primary source of genetic variation required for evolutionary novelty and adaptation. Nevertheless, most mutations, especially those with phenotypic effects, are harmful and are consequently removed by natural selection. For this reason, under natural selection, an organism will evolve to a lower mutation rate. Overall, the action of natural selection on mutation rate is related to population size and mutation effects. Although theoretical work has intensively investigated the relationship between natural selection and mutation rate, most of these studies have focused on individual competition within a population, rather than on competition among populations. The aim of the present study was to use computer simulations to investigate how natural selection adjusts mutation rate among asexually reproducing subpopulations with different mutation rates.Results: The competition results for the different subpopulations showed that a population could evolve to an "optimum" mutation rate during long-term evolution, and that this rate was modulated by both population size and mutation effects. A larger population could evolve to a higher optimum mutation rate than could a smaller population. The optimum mutation rate depended on both the fraction and the effects of beneficial mutations, rather than on the effects of deleterious ones. The optimum mutation rate increased with either the fraction or the effects of beneficial mutations. When strongly favored mutations appeared, the optimum mutation rate was elevated to a much higher level. The competition time among the subpopulations also substantially shortened.Conclusions: Competition at the population level revealed that the evolution of the mutation rate in asexual populations was determined by both population size and mutation effects. The most striking finding was that beneficial mutations, rather than deleterious mutations, were the leading force that modulated the optimum mutation rate. The initial configuration of the population appeared to have no effect on these conclusions, confirming the robustness of the simulation method developed in the present study. These findings might further explain the lower mutation rates observed in most asexual organisms, as well as the higher mutation rates in some viruses.

Interference Effects of Deleterious and Beneficial Mutations in Large Asexual Populations

The Influence Of Deleterious Mutations On Adaptation In Asexual Populations

Clonal Interference, Multiple Mutations, and Adaptation in Large Asexual Populations

Effect of drift, selection and recombination on the equilibrium frequency of deleterious mutations

Beneficial mutation-selection balance and the effect of linkage on positive selection

An integrated model of the effects on fitness of beneficial, deleterious, and neutral mutations in sexual populations

A dynamical limit to evolutionary adaptation

Interference limits resolution of selection pressures from linked neutral diversity

Graph-structured populations elucidate the role of deleterious mutations in long-term evolution

Genomic mutation rates that neutralize adaptive evolution and natural selection

The Effect of Overdominance on Characterizing Deleterious Mutations in Large Natural Populations.

Evolving a favorable distribution for mutation effects

The Rate of Adaptation in Large Sexual Populations with Linear Chromosomes

From Drift to Draft: How Much Do Beneficial Mutations Actually Contribute to Predictions of Ohta’s Slightly Deleterious Model of Molecular Evolution?

Impacts of Mutation Effects and Population Size on Mutation Rate in Asexual Populations: A Simulation Study

Overdominant Mutations Restrict Adaptive Loss of Heterozygosity at Linked Loci

Fixation probability and fixation time in structured populations

Mutation bias alters the distribution of fitness effects of mutations

Analysis Of The Fitness Effect Of Compensatory Mutations

Deleterious Mutation/Epimutation-Selection Balance with and without Inbreeding: A Population (Epi)Genetics Model

Note on the Computation of Critical Effective Population Sizes.