Comparison of polidocanol foam versus bleomycin polidocanol foam for treatment of venous malformations

Bin He,Bo Yang,Jie Chen,Peng Liu,Qiang-qiang Nie,Jian-bin Zhang,Xue-qiang Fan,Zhi-dong Ye
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2022.06.005
2022-08-06
Abstract:Objective The objective of this research was to retrospectively investigate the difference of safety and efficacy between polidocanol foam and bleomycin polidocanol foam (BPF) in the treatment of venous malformations (VMs), and provide clinical evidence for the application of BPF for VMs. Methods Patients with VMs treated with polidocanol foam and BPF were included between July 2018 to July 2020. The VM tissue involvements and symptoms were collected. The treatment outcomes were evaluated by the clinical improvement of symptoms and the degree of devascularization at ultrasound or MRI. Patients were followed up for 1, 3, and 6 months after the sclerotherapy. The immediate or delayed complications were closely looked for and recorded. Results A total of fifty-one patients were included, including 34 females and 17 males with a mean age of 26.8 years (range, 5-65 years). The most commonly involved sites were lower extremities (31/60, 51.7%), and the most common symptom was pain (33/51, 64.7%). Fifty-four sclerotherapies were performed with a mean of 1.06±0.24 sessions (range 1-2 sessions) per patient. The reduction percentage of lesion volume in the BPF group was significantly higher than the POL group (79.4±1.6% versus 55.7±6.1%, P<0.001). Meantime, the patients' satisfaction scores in the BPF group were significantly higher than the POL group (7.2±1.1 versus 5.7±0.8, P<0.001). No major complication was observed in both groups. CIRSE grade 1 complications occurred in 5/21 patients in the BPF group and 7/30 patients in the POL group, CIRSE grade 2 complications occurred in 5/21 patients in the BPF group and 4/30 patients in the POL group, and there were no significant differences between the two groups. Conclusions Bleomycin polidocanol foam is a safe and effective sclerosant for VMs, showing better efficacy and similar safety than commonly used mild sclerosant. It could be a promising agent to treat VMs or other slow-flow vascular malformations.
surgery,peripheral vascular disease
What problem does this paper attempt to address?