Abstract:Vascular, Ahead of Print. BackgroundGreat saphenous vein insufficiency (GSVI) adversely affects the quality of life of affected individuals. Minimally invasive endo-venous ablation techniques have emerged as effective and safe treatments, despite the longstanding use of surgical interventions. We aim in our study to evaluate all the available interventions in the literature, either endo-venous or conventional approaches for the treatment of GSVI.MethodsA thorough search was performed across four electronic databases to identify relevant studies. A frequentist network meta-analysis (NWM) was executed on the combined data to derive network estimates pertaining to the outcomes of concern. Risk ratios (RRs) were employed as the effect size metric for binary outcomes, while mean differences (MDs) were utilized for continuous outcomes, each reported with a 95% confidence interval. The qualitative review was conducted employing the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool 1.ResultsOur NWM included 75 studies encompassing 12,196 patients. Regarding technical success rate within the first 5 years after treatment, Endo-venous Laser Ablation (EVLA) with High Ligation and Stripping (HL/S), EVLA alone, Cyanoacrylate Adhesive Injection, cryostripping, HL/S and Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) were significantly better than Ultrasound-Guided Foam Sclerotherapy and F-care. Also, invagination stripping was inferior to all interventions. Conservative Hemodynamic Cure for Venous Insufficiency and Varicose Veins (CHIVA) demonstrated a significantly lower recurrence rate with a RR of 0.35 [0.15; 0.79] compared to RFA, but RFA was more effective in recurrence prevention than HL/S and Mechanochemical Ablation (MOCA), with a RR of 0.63 [0.41; 0.97] and 0.18 [0.03; 0.95], respectively. Endo-venous Steam Ablation (EVSA) emerged as the most effective in reducing post-intervention pain, showing a MD of −2.73 [−3.72; −1.74] compared to HL/S. In Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire outcome, our analysis favored MOCA over most studied interventions, with an MD of −6.88 [−12.43; −1.32] compared to HL/S. Safety outcomes did not significantly differ among interventions.ConclusionOur findings revealed significant variations in the technical success rates, recurrence rates, and post-intervention pain levels among different interventions. CHIVA exhibited enhanced performance in terms of lower recurrence rates, while EVSA emerged as a promising choice for mitigating post-intervention pain. Additionally, our analysis underscored the significance of patient-reported outcomes, with MOCA consistently yielding favorable results in terms of enhancing quality of life and expediting the return to regular activities.

Impact of treatment of varicose veins with polidocanol foam compared to conventional surgery on quality of life

Polidocanol-foam treatment of varicose veins: Quality-of-life impact compared to conventional surgery

A comparative study on radiofrequency endovenous obliteration (RFO) and saphenous veins stripping for the treatment of varicose veins

Treatment of male varicoceles by transcatheter polidocanol foam sclerotherapy: evaluation of clinical success, complications, and patients’ satisfaction with regard to alternative techniques

Fluoroscopy-guided foam sclerotherapy for varicose veins in the legs: a retrospective cohort analysis with long-term follow-up

VIEW-VLU observational study of the effect of Varithena on wound healing in the treatment of venous leg ulcers

Comparison of Foam Sclerotherapy Alone or Combined With Stripping of the Great Saphenous Vein for Treating Varicose Veins.

Treatment of varicose great saphenous vein with endovenous laser alone or combined with eco-guided foam sclerotherapy: A randomized controlled trial

Percutaneous Sclerotherapy of Large Venous Malformations Using Consecutive Polidocanol and Bleomycin Foam: MR Imaging Volumetric and Quality-of-Life Assessment

Comparison of polidocanol foam versus bleomycin polidocanol foam for treatment of venous malformations

Clinical outcomes and predictors of bleomycin polidocanol foam sclerotherapy treatment response in venous malformations

Endovenous laser ablation and concomitant foam sclerotherapy: experience in 504 patients

Comparison of bleomycin polidocanol foam versus electrochemotherapy combined with polidocanol foam for treatment of venous malformations

Combination Foam and Liquid Sclerotherapy for Lower Extremity Reticular and Telangiectatic Veins: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Interventions for great saphenous vein insufficiency: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Safety and Efficacy of Combining Saphenous Endovenous Laser Ablation and Varicose Veins Foam Sclerotherapy: An Analysis on 5500 Procedures in Patients With Advance Chronic Venous Disease (C3-C6)

Sub-ulcer Foam Sclerotherapy in Patients with Venous Leg Ulcer, Analysis and Technical Aspects of 134 Consecutive Patients

Clinical outcomes of nonthermal ablation, thermal ablation, and surgical stripping for varicose veins

A review of randomised controlled trials comparing ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy with endothermal ablation for the treatment of great saphenous varicose veins

First registry of patients treated with foam sclerotherapy using a new automated microfoam preparation device (2021-2022)

Evaluation of endolaser thermoablation of the small saphenous vein under local anesthesia