Research Agenda and Applications for Preliminarily Validated Measures of d/Deaf and Hard of Hearing Stigma
Rachel D. Stelmach,Lawrence G. Musa,Jessica S. West,Margaret I. Wallhagen,John D. Kraemer,Howard W. Francis,Melissa A. Stockton,Catherine McMahon,Sherri L. Smith,Laura Nyblade
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0000000000001491
2024-09-20
Ear & Hearing
Abstract:Valid survey measures provide important evidence for program designers, advocates, and policymakers. They allow for the quantification of ideas, the calculation of their relationships with other outcomes, and the development of comparisons across geographies and populations as well as over time. Such measures, however, require the use of simple numeric values to describe complex phenomena. One such complex phenomenon is stigma, a relational phenomenon that occurs within the existing power structures of a society when a person possesses, or is thought to possess, attributes that others consider to be of little value, abnormal, or undesirable in a particular social context ( Becker 1981 ; Crocker et al. 1998 ; Nyblade et al. 2019 ). The intensely personal experience of stigma, combined with the complexity of the social structures that shape it, can create the impression that we cannot measure stigma. In reality, however, a systematic review of stigma measurement studies has found that stigma manifests in remarkably consistent ways across cultural settings, public health fields, and even health conditions ( Van Brakel 2006 ). Consistent measures for stigma, especially those that disaggregate different kinds of stigma, provide an important complement to qualitative methods and allow for a more comprehensive understanding of how stigma affects people's lives. In turn, this understanding can inform the development of specific interventions that account for different types of stigma, including interventions that directly address the stigma associated with a given health condition. In a systematic review of the stigma literature, evidence from health fields as disparate as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), leprosy, tuberculosis, and mental health shows that interventions and strategies that explicitly account for stigma can meaningfully improve the quality of life of those affected by these conditions ( Heijnders & Van Der Meij 2006 ).
otorhinolaryngology,audiology & speech-language pathology