Abstract:This study addresses the ongoing debate on forest land-sparing vs land-sharing, aiming to identify effective strategies for both species conservation and timber exploitation. Previous studies, guided by control theory, compared sharing and sparing by optimizing logging intensity along a presumed trade-off between timber yield and ecological outcomes. However, the realism of this trade-off assumption is questioned by ecological and governance theories. This article introduces a mathematical model of Social-Ecological System (SES) dynamics, distinguishing selective logging intensification between sharing and sparing, with associated governance requirements. The model assumes consistent rules for logging, replanting, conservation support, access regulation, socio-economic, soil and climate conditions. Actors, each specialized in sustainable logging and replanting of a single species, coexist with various tree species in the same space for land sharing, contrasting with separate actions on monospecific stands for sparing. In sharing scenarios, a gradient of intensification is created from 256 combinations of selective logging for a forest with eight coexisting tree species. This is compared with eight scenarios of monospecific stands adjacent to a spared eight-species forest area safeguarded from logging. Numerical projections over 100 years rank sparing and sharing options based on forest-level tree biodiversity, carbon storage, and timber yield. The findings underscore the context-specific nature of the problem but identify simple heuristics to optimize both sparing and sharing practices. Prioritizing the most productive tree species is effective when selecting sparing, especially when timber yield and biodiversity are benchmarks. Conversely, sharing consistently outperforms sparing when carbon storage and biodiversity are main criteria. Sharing excels across scenarios considering all three criteria, provided a greater diversity of actors access and coexist in the shared space under collective rules ensuring independence and sustainable logging and replanting. The present model addresses some limitations in existing sparing-sharing theory by aligning with established ecological theories exploring the intricate relationship between disturbance practices, productivity and ecological outcomes. The findings also support a governance hypothesis from the 2009 Nobel Prize in Economics (E. Ostrom) regarding the positive impact on biodiversity and productivity of increasing polycentricity, i.e ., expanding the number of independent species controllers’ channels (loggers/replanters/supporters/regulators). This hypothesis, rooted in Ashby’s law of requisite variety from control theory, suggests that resolving the sharing/sparing dilemma may depend on our ability to predict the yield-ecology performances of sparing (in heterogeneous landscapes) vs of sharing (in the same space) from their respective levels of “polycentric requisite variety”.

Reciprocal relationships between forest management and regional landscape structures: applying concepts from land system science to private forest management

Exploring trade-offs in agro-ecological landscapes: using a multi-objective land-use allocation model to support agroforestry research

Aligning Agent-Based Modeling With Multi-Objective Land-Use Allocation: Identification of Policy Gaps and Feasible Pathways to Biophysically Optimal Landscapes

Insights on linking forests, trees, and people from the air, on the ground, and in the laboratory

Land use transitions and land management: A mutual feedback perspective

Navigating the complexities of the forest land sharing vs sparing logging dilemma: analytical insights through the governance theory of social-ecological systems dynamics

Implications for forest management planning in the Northeast: a systematic map

Comparison of managed and pre-settlement landscape dynamics in forests of the Pacific Northwest, USA

The Northwest Forest Plan as a model for broad-scale ecosystem management: a social perspective

Biophysical considerations in forestry for climate protection

Solving Conflicts among Conservation, Economic, and Social Objectives in Boreal Production Forest Landscapes: Fennoscandian Perspectives

Towards sustainable forest management in the European Union through polycentric forest governance and an integrated landscape approach

Movement of people across the landscape: a blurring of distinctions between areas, interests, and issues affecting natural resource management

A cup of tea? – The role of social relationships, networks and learning in land managers’ adaptations to policy change

Where to put things? Spatial land management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns

Working on institutions while planning for forest resilience: a case study of public land management in the United States

Natural Disturbance-Based Forest Management: Moving Beyond Retention and Continuous-Cover Forestry

The functional complex network approach to foster forest resilience to global changes

A game‐theoretic systematics of conservation and management of spatial ecosystem services

Forest fates: Unraveling the peri-urban social–ecological trajectories in Mexico City's conservation land

Emulating boreal forest disturbance dynamics: Can we maintain timber supply, aboriginal land use, and woodland caribou habitat?