Abstract:The MethaneSAT satellite instrument and its aircraft precursor, MethaneAIR, are imaging spectrometers designed to measure methane concentrations with wide spatial coverage, fine spatial resolution, and high precision compared to currently deployed remote sensing instruments. At 12 960 m cruise altitude above ground (13 850 m above sea level), MethaneAIR datasets have a 4.5 km swath gridded to 10 m × 10 m pixels with 17–20 ppb standard deviation on a flat scene. MethaneAIR was deployed in the summer of 2021 in the Permian Basin to test the accuracy of the retrieved methane concentrations and emission rates using the algorithms developed for MethaneSAT. We report here point source emissions obtained during a single-blind volume-controlled release experiment, using two methods. (1) The modified integrated mass enhancement (mIME) method estimates emission rates using the total mass enhancement of methane in an observed plume combined with winds obtained from Weather Research Forecast driven by High-Resolution Rapid Refresh meteorological data in Large Eddy Simulations mode (WRF-LES-HRRR). WRF-LES-HRRR simulates winds in stochastic eddy-scale (100–1000 m) variability, which is particularly important for low-wind conditions and informing the error budget. The mIME can estimate emission rates of plumes of any size that are detectable by MethaneAIR. (2) The divergence integral (DI) method applies Gauss's theorem to estimate the flux divergence fields through a series of closed surfaces enclosing the sources. The set of boxes grows from the upwind side of the plume through the core of each plume and downwind. No selection of inflow concentration, as used in the mIME, is required. The DI approach can efficiently determine fluxes from large sources and clusters of sources but cannot resolve small point emissions. These methods account for the effects of eddy-scale variation in different ways: the DI averages across many eddies, whereas the mIME re-samples many eddies from the LES simulation. The DI directly uses HRRR winds, while mIME uses WRF-LES-HRRR wind products. Emissions estimates from both the mIME and DI methods agreed closely with the single-blind volume-controlled experiments ( N = 21). The York regression between the estimated emissions and the released emissions has a slope of 0.96 [0.84, 1.08], R = 0.83 and N = 21, with 30 % mean percentage error for the whole dataset, which indicates that MethaneAIR can quantify point sources emitting more than 200 kg h −1 for the mIME and 500 kg h −1 for the DI method. The two methods also agreed on methane emission estimates from various uncontrolled sources in the Permian Basin. The experiment thus demonstrates the powerful potential of the MethaneAIR instrument and suggests that the quantification method should be transferable to MethaneSAT if it meets the design specifications.

Validation and demonstration of a drone-based method for quantifying fugitive methane emissions

A new aerial approach for quantifying and attributing methane emissions: implementation and validation

Sensitive Drone Mapping of Methane Emissions without the Need for Supplementary Ground-Based Measurements

Emission Determination by Three Remote Sensing Methods in Two Release Trials

A Study of a Miniature TDLAS System Onboard Two Unmanned Aircraft to Independently Quantify Methane Emissions from Oil and Gas Production Assets and Other Industrial Emitters

Controlled-release Experiment to Investigate Uncertainties in UAV-based Emission Quantification for Methane Point Sources

Methodology and Uncertainty Analysis of Methane Flux Measurement for Small Sources Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

Quantifying methane emission from fugitive sources by combining tracer release and downwind measurements - a sensitivity analysis based on multiple field surveys

High-resolution Modelling of Methane Plumes: Validation and Sensitivity Experiments to Explore UAV and Satellite Observations

Development of Methods for Top-Down Methane Emission Measurements of Oil and Gas Facilities in an Offshore Environment Using a Miniature Methane Spectrometer and Long-Endurance Uncrewed Aerial System

Evaluating the use of an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-based active AirCore system to quantify methane emissions from dairy cows

Quantitative comparison of methods used to estimate methane emissions from small point sources

Lessons learned from a UAV survey and methane emissions calculation at a UK landfill

Methane point source quantification using MethaneAIR: a new airborne imaging spectrometer

Towards accurate methane point-source quantification from high-resolution 2D plume imagery

Detection of Methane Leaks via a Drone-Based System for Sustainable Landfills and Oil and Gas Facilities: Effect of Different Variables on the Background-Noise Measurement

Using airborne technology to quantify and apportion emissions of CH4 and NH3 from feedlots

Assessment of current methane emission quantification techniques for natural gas midstream applications

A measurement system for CO2 and CH4 emissions quantification of industrial sites using a new in situ concentration sensor operated on board uncrewed aircraft vehicles

A top-down approach for quantifying methane and speciated VOC emissions from North Sea oil and gas facilities

UAV Based In situ Measurements of CO2 and CH4 Fluxes over Complex Natural Ecosystems