Abstract:Introduction: Algorithmic decision-making systems are widely used in various sectors, including criminal justice, employment, and education. While these systems are celebrated for their potential to enhance efficiency and objectivity, they also pose risks of perpetuating and amplifying societal biases and discrimination. This paper aims to provide an indepth analysis of the types of algorithmic discrimination, exploring both the challenges and potential solutions. Methods: The methodology includes a systematic literature review, analysis of legal documents, and comparative case studies across different geographic regions and sectors. This multifaceted approach allows for a thorough exploration of the complexity of algorithmic bias and its regulation. Results: We identify five primary types of algorithmic bias: bias by algorithmic agents, discrimination based on feature selection, proxy discrimination, disparate impact, and targeted advertising. The analysis of the U.S. legal and regulatory framework reveals a landscape of principled regulations, preventive controls, consequential liability, self-regulation, and heteronomy regulation. A comparative perspective is also provided by examining the status of algorithmic fairness in the EU, Canada, Australia, and Asia. Conclusion: Real-world impacts are demonstrated through case studies focusing on criminal risk assessments and hiring algorithms, illustrating the tangible effects of algorithmic discrimination. The paper concludes with recommendations for interdisciplinary research, proactive policy development, public awareness, and ongoing monitoring to promote fairness and accountability in algorithmic decision-making. As the use of AI and automated systems expands globally, this work highlights the importance of developing comprehensive, adaptive approaches to combat algorithmic discrimination and ensure the socially responsible deployment of these powerful technologies.

Algorithms and Decision-Making in the Public Sector

A Framework of High-Stakes Algorithmic Decision-Making for the Public Sector Developed through a Case Study of Child-Welfare

Administration by Algorithm? Public Management meets Public Sector Machine Learning

The Public Algorithms Survey in Allegheny County

Administration by Algorithm?

Administration by algorithm: A risk management framework

Human-AI Interactions in Public Sector Decision-Making: "Automation Bias" and "Selective Adherence" to Algorithmic Advice

Procedural Fairness as Stepping Stone for Successful Implementation of Algorithmic Decision-Making in Public Administration: Review and Outlook

Algorithmic Harms in Child Welfare: Uncertainties in Practice, Organization, and Street-level Decision-Making

Algorithmic bias: Looking beyond data bias to ensure algorithmic accountability and equity

Governance and Communication of Algorithmic Decision Making: A Case Study on Public Sector

The Algorithmic Leviathan: Arbitrariness, Fairness, and Opportunity in Algorithmic Decision Making Systems

Are algorithms always fair? The study on public preferences toward algorithmic decision‐making: A case study from the perspectives of decision scenarios and social roles

Analysing and Organising Human Communications for AI Fairness-Related Decisions: Use Cases from the Public Sector

Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairness

Fairness perceptions of algorithmic decision-making: A systematic review of the empirical literature

Decision Support Systems, Social Justice and Algorithmic Accountability in Social Work: A New Challenge

Public administration, public leadership and the construction of public value in the age of the algorithm and ‘big data’

Algorithmic discrimination: examining its types and regulatory measures with emphasis on US legal practices

Algorithmic regulation: A critical interrogation

The Tyranny of Data? The Bright and Dark Sides of Data-Driven Decision-Making for Social Good