Abstract:The relationships between digital governments and private digital technology corporations shape investments that endure for years, even decades. Yet recent changes have been under-researched in public management and accountability studies. Until the 2010s systems integrators (SIs) were dominant, producing proprietary legacy computer systems that still shape government technologies today. Since that time, governments have become increasingly reliant on the online tools and cloud technologies developed by Silicon Valley (SV) firms and platform corporations. To keep digital investments in line with business and civil society progress, governments have had to catch up and innovate with the latest generation of data-intensive technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI), and to adopt some SV organizational culture and practices in government. However, previous long time-lags in public sector responses highlight many lessons for today's digital government change pioneers. In particular, the article illustrates the importance for digital managers of accelerating change in government organizational cultures, and developing the expertise to manage contractual diversity. Until 2010, Anglosphere digital governments struggled to modernize, dependent on large-scale contract relationships with global systems integrators (SIs) and elderly, custom-built legacy systems. Policy-makers have (belatedly) converted to the value of the latest Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies for improving government. Using elite interviews with government officials in three Anglosphere governments, this article traces the origins of this conversion back to Silicon Valley (SV) and platform corporations. These massive firms drove cultural, organizational and technological developments that reduced the influence of SIs. Going forward, SV firms' practices will now drive public management use of data science and AI, shaping financial systems and practices. Drawing together elements from business studies, organizational change, public management reform, digital government and AI scholarship and practice, the authors show how government's relationships with SV firms re-shape political economy relationships and bring digital change in government closer to SV ways of working.

Public administration, public leadership and the construction of public value in the age of the algorithm and ‘big data’

Administration by Algorithm? Public Management meets Public Sector Machine Learning

Rethinking Administrative Law for Algorithmic Decision Making

Algorithms and Decision-Making in the Public Sector

Algorithmic governmentality and the space of ethics: Examples from ‘People Analytics’

New Pythias of public administration: ambiguity and choice in AI systems as challenges for governance

The big data public and its problems: Big data and the structural transformation of the public sphere

Of algorithms, Apps and advice: digital social policy and service delivery

Law and the Emerging Political Economy of Algorithmic Audits

Administration by Algorithm?

Procedural Fairness as Stepping Stone for Successful Implementation of Algorithmic Decision-Making in Public Administration: Review and Outlook

Public engagement and AI: A values analysis of national strategies

Administration by algorithm: A risk management framework

Governing by Algorithm? No Noise and (Potentially) Less Bias

The Public Algorithms Survey in Allegheny County

Big Data, Algorithmic Governmentality and the Regulation of Pandemic Risk

On phantom publics, clusters, and collectives: be(com)ing subject in algorithmic times

Big data surveillance across fields: Algorithmic governance for policing & regulation

Algorithmic accountability in U.S. cities: Transparency, impact, and political economy

International Experience of Applying Management Technologies in the System of Public Administration

The political economy of digital government: How Silicon Valley firms drove conversion to data science and artificial intelligence in public management