P090 A randomized study to compare the efficacy of topical tofacitinib vs. topical tacrolimus in treatment of patients with unstable vitiligo

Hitaishi Mehta,Anuradha Bishnoi,K Vinay,Sendhil Kumaran,Davinder Parsad
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljae090.117
IF: 11.113
2024-06-28
British Journal of Dermatology
Abstract:Abstract Topical tacrolimus 0.1% is a widely accepted treatment for localized vitiligo. However, emerging Janus kinase inhibitors like tofacitinib show promise. Existing evidence for topical tofacitinib largely comes from open-label, uncontrolled studies and case reports, often in combination with other therapies. This prospective, 16-week, single-blinded, split-body study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of topical tofacitinib 2% ointment vs. topical tacrolimus 0.1% ointment applied twice daily in a cohort of 25 patients with limited vitiligo. Participants aged ≥ 5 years with a diagnosis of nonsegmental vitiligo, limited to ≤ 10% body surface area, and at least two symmetrical vitiligo patches that had been active in last 12 months were included. After informed consent was obtained, vitiliginous patches on either side of the body were randomized to receive either topical tofacitinib or topical tacrolimus. The total duration of therapy was 16 weeks, and patients were followed up every 4 weeks. The primary outcome was Vitiligo Noticeability Scale (VNS) of two symmetrical target patches at week 16 as reported by patients, with a VNS of 4 (‘a lot less noticeable’) or 5 (‘no longer noticeable’) considered as treatment success. Secondary outcomes included clinician-reported percentage repigmentation, time to attainment of treatment success and incidence of adverse effects. The study cohort, comprising 25 patients analysed for 50 vitiligo patches, had a mean age of 22.4 years (range 5–59). The topical tofacitinib group achieved a VNS of 4 or 5 (considered treatment success) in 14 patients (56%), compared with 11 (44%) in the tacrolimus group (P = 0.40). Clinicians observed significant repigmentation exceeding 75% in 15 patients within the tofacitinib group and 13 patients within the tacrolimus group (P = 0.57). The mean (SD) time to attain treatment success was 12.4 (3.8) weeks for tacrolimus and 10.0 (4.4) weeks for tofacitinib. Strikingly, tofacitinib demonstrated treatment success as early as 4 weeks in three patients, whereas no such rapid success was observed in the tacrolimus group. Adverse effects, predominantly mild, included transient erythema (n = 1) and burning sensations (n = 5) with tacrolimus, while tofacitinib led to application-site pain and pruritus in one patient each (P = 0.12). Limitations of our study include the small sample size, short treatment duration and single-blinded study design. In summation, this study unveils the efficacy of both topical tofacitinib and tacrolimus in repigmenting vitiligo lesions. Tofacitinib exhibits a higher, though statistically nonsignificant, treatment success rate and a swifter onset of repigmentation, indicating its potential as a robust therapeutic option for limited vitiligo.
dermatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?