Sustainable materials for 3D concrete printing

Shantanu Bhattacherjee,Anusha S. Basavaraj,A.V. Rahul,Manu Santhanam,Ravindra Gettu,Biranchi Panda,Erik Schlangen,Yu Chen,Oguzhan Copuroglu,Guowei Ma,Li Wang,Mirza Abdul Basit Beigh,Viktor Mechtcherine
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104156
IF: 9.93
2021-09-01
Cement and Concrete Composites
Abstract:This paper explores the sustainability aspects of binders used in concrete 3D concrete printing. Firstly, a prospective approach to conduct sustainability-assessment based on the life cycle of 3D printed structures is presented, which also highlights the importance of considering the functional requirements of the mixes used for 3D printing. The potential of the material production phase is emphasized to enhance the sustainability potential of 3DCP by reducing the embodied impacts. The literature on the different binder systems used for producing 3D printable mixtures is reviewed. This review includes binders based on portland cement and supplementary cementing materials (SCMs) such as fly ash, silica-fume and slag. Also, alternative binders such as geopolymer, calcium sulfo-aluminate cement (CSA), limestone calcined clay cement (LC3) and reactive magnesium oxide systems are explored. Finally, sustainability assessment by quantifying the environmental impacts in terms of energy consumed and CO2 emissions of mixtures is illustrated with different binder systems. This paper underlines the effect of using SCMs and alternative binder systems for improving the sustainability of 3D printed structures.
construction & building technology,materials science, composites
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate and improve the sustainability of materials used for 3D concrete printing (3DCP). Specifically, the paper focuses on the following aspects: 1. **Sustainability assessment methods**: The paper proposes a sustainability assessment method based on the life cycle of 3D - printed structures, emphasizing the importance of considering the functional requirements of 3D - printed mixtures. 2. **Potential in the material production stage**: The paper emphasizes the potential of the material production stage in improving the sustainability of 3DCP, especially by reducing the environmental impact of materials. 3. **Review of different cementitious material systems**: The paper reviews various cementitious material systems used to produce 3D - printed mixtures, including ordinary Portland cement and its supplementary cementitious materials (such as fly ash, silica fume, slag), as well as alternative cementitious materials (such as geopolymers, calcium sulfoaluminate cement (CSA), limestone - calcined clay cement (LC3) and reactive magnesia systems). 4. **Quantification of environmental impacts**: The paper shows how to conduct sustainability assessment by quantifying the energy consumption and CO2 emissions of different cementitious material systems. 5. **Effects of using supplementary and alternative cementitious materials**: The paper explores the effects of using supplementary and alternative cementitious materials on improving the sustainability of 3D - printed structures. Through these studies, the paper aims to provide theoretical and practical guidance for the sustainable development of 3D concrete printing technology, especially in terms of reducing environmental impacts and improving economic feasibility.