Abstract:Background Head and neck (HN) gross tumor volume (GTV) auto‐segmentation is challenging due to the morphological complexity and low image contrast of targets. Multi‐modality images, including computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET), are used in the routine clinic to assist radiation oncologists for accurate GTV delineation. However, the availability of PET imaging may not always be guaranteed. Purpose To develop a deep learning segmentation framework for automated GTV delineation of HN cancers using a combination of PET/CT images, while addressing the challenge of missing PET data. Methods Two datasets were included for this study: Dataset I: 524 (training) and 359 (testing) oropharyngeal cancer patients from different institutions with their PET/CT pairs provided by the HECKTOR Challenge; Dataset II: 90 HN patients(testing) from a local institution with their planning CT, PET/CT pairs. To handle potentially missing PET images, a model training strategy named the "Blank Channel" method was implemented. To simulate the absence of a PET image, a blank array with the same dimensions as the CT image was generated to meet the dual‐channel input requirement of the deep learning model. During the model training process, the model was randomly presented with either a real PET/CT pair or a blank/CT pair. This allowed the model to learn the relationship between the CT image and the corresponding GTV delineation based on available modalities. As a result, our model had the ability to handle flexible inputs during prediction, making it suitable for cases where PET images are missing. To evaluate the performance of our proposed model, we trained it using training patients from Dataset I and tested it with Dataset II. We compared our model (Model 1) with two other models which were trained for specific modality segmentations: Model 2 trained with only CT images, and Model 3 trained with real PET/CT pairs. The performance of the models was evaluated using quantitative metrics, including Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), mean surface distance (MSD), and 95% Hausdorff Distance (HD95). In addition, we evaluated our Model 1 and Model 3 using the 359 test cases in Dataset I. Results Our proposed model(Model 1) achieved promising results for GTV auto‐segmentation using PET/CT images, with the flexibility of missing PET images. Specifically, when assessed with only CT images in Dataset II, Model 1 achieved DSC of 0.56 ± 0.16, MSD of 3.4 ± 2.1 mm, and HD95 of 13.9 ± 7.6 mm. When the PET images were included, the performance of our model was improved to DSC of 0.62 ± 0.14, MSD of 2.8 ± 1.7 mm, and HD95 of 10.5 ± 6.5 mm. These results are comparable to those achieved by Model 2 and Model 3, illustrating Model 1′s effectiveness in utilizing flexible input modalities. Further analysis using the test dataset from Dataset I showed that Model 1 achieved an average DSC of 0.77, surpassing the overall average DSC of 0.72 among all participants in the HECKTOR Challenge. Conclusions We successfully refined a multi‐modal segmentation tool for accurate GTV delineation for HN cancer. Our method addressed the issue of missing PET images by allowing flexible data input, thereby providing a practical solution for clinical settings where access to PET imaging may be limited.

Comparison of deep learning networks for fully automated head and neck tumor delineation on multi-centric PET/CT images

Deep Learning-Based Multi-Modality Segmentation of Primary Gross Tumor Volume in CT and MRI for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Automated Delineation of Nasopharynx Gross Tumor Volume for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma by Plain CT Combining Contrast-Enhanced CT Using Deep Learning

Comparing different CT, PET and MRI multi-modality image combinations for deep learning-based head and neck tumor segmentation

Gross tumor volume segmentation for head and neck cancer radiotherapy using deep dense multi-modality network

Deep Learning-Based Segmentation of Tumors in PET/CT Volumes: Benchmark of Different Architectures and Training Strategies

Multi‐modal segmentation with missing image data for automatic delineation of gross tumor volumes in head and neck cancers

Deep learning for automatic tumour segmentation in PET/CT images of patients with head and neck cancers

Head and neck tumor segmentation convolutional neural network robust to missing PET/CT modalities using channel dropout

Head and Neck Tumor Segmentation in PET/CT: the HECKTOR Challenge

Clinical evaluation of deep learning-based automatic clinical target volume segmentation: a single-institution multi-site tumor experience

Head and neck tumor segmentation in PET/CT: The HECKTOR challenge.

Head and Neck Cancer Segmentation in FDG PET Images: Performance Comparison of Convolutional Neural Networks and Vision Transformers

Combining CNN and Hybrid Active Contours for Head and Neck Tumor Segmentation in CT and PET images

Comprehensive framework for evaluation of deep neural networks in detection and quantification of lymphoma from PET/CT images: clinical insights, pitfalls, and observer agreement analyses

Whole-body tumor segmentation of 18F -FDG PET/CT using a cascaded and ensembled convolutional neural networks

Multi-modal co-learning with attention mechanism for head and neck tumor segmentation on 18FDG PET-CT

Automated Lung Cancer Segmentation Using a Dual-Modality Deep Learning Network with PET and CT Images

Segment anything model for head and neck tumor segmentation with CT, PET and MRI multi-modality images

Head and neck multi-organ segmentation on dual-energy CT using dual pyramid convolutional neural networks

Tumor co-segmentation in PET/CT using multi-modality fully convolutional neural network