Abstract:Although human existence is enveloped by ideologies, remarkably little is understood about the relationships between ideological attitudes and psychological traits. Even less is known about how cognitive dispositions – individual differences in how information is perceived and processed – sculpt individuals’ ideological worldviews, proclivities for extremist beliefs, and resistance (or receptivity) to evidence. Using an unprecedented number of cognitive tasks (N=37) and personality surveys (N=22), along with data-driven analyses including drift-diffusion and Bayesian modelling, we uncovered the specific psychological signatures of political, nationalistic, religious, and dogmatic beliefs. Cognitive and personality assessments consistently outperformed demographic predictors in accounting for individual differences in ideological preferences by 4 to 15-fold. Furthermore, data-driven analyses revealed that individuals’ ideological attitudes mirrored their cognitive decision-making strategies. Conservatism and nationalism were related to greater caution in perceptual decision-making tasks and to reduced strategic information processing, while dogmatism was associated with slower evidence accumulation and impulsive tendencies. Religiosity was implicated in heightened agreeableness and risk perception. Extreme pro-group attitudes, including violence endorsement against outgroups, were linked to poorer working memory, slower perceptual strategies, and tendencies towards impulsivity and sensation-seeking – reflecting overlaps with the psychological profiles of conservatism and dogmatism. Cognitive and personality signatures were also generated for ideologies such as authoritarianism, system justification, social dominance orientation, patriotism, and receptivity to evidence or alternative viewpoints; elucidating their underpinnings and highlighting avenues for future research. Together these findings suggest that ideological worldviews may be reflective of low-level perceptual and cognitive functions.

The relationship between political ideology and judgements of bias in distributional outcomes

When do we care about political neutrality? The hypocritical nature of reaction to political bias

Political rule (vs. opposition) predicts whether ideological prejudice is stronger in U.S. conservatives or progressives

Who Said or What Said? Estimating Ideological Bias in Views Among Economists

Uses and Abuses of Ideology in Political Psychology

Implications of ideological bias in social psychology on clinical practice.

Political Ideology and Attitudinal Ambivalence: Investigating the Role of Ideological Extremity

Partisan Bias in Political Judgment

Measuring dynamic media bias

Implicit and Explicit Illusory Correlation as a Function of Political Ideology

Confirmation biases in selective exposure to political online information: Source bias vs. content bias

Political Ideology and Moral Dilemma Judgments: An Analysis Using the CNI Model

The moral foundations of illusory correlation

The role of ideological and intergroup mechanisms in predicting opposition to redistribution and discrimination against the lower social class

A Note on Bias to Complete

Registered report: Cognitive ability, but not cognitive reflection, predicts expressing greater political animosity and favouritism

Ideology, Information, and Social Welfare Preferences

Intergroup Bias in Political Decision Making

A Data-Driven Analysis of the Cognitive and Perceptual Attributes of Ideological Attitudes

Better or Different? How Political Ideology Shapes Preferences for Differentiation in the Social Hierarchy

Intergroup Bias in Attitudes Toward Restrictions on Uncivil Political Expression and Its Underlying Mechanisms