Abstract:Abstract. As the ability to make predictions regarding uncertainty information representing natural hazards increases, an important question for those designing and communicating hazard forecasts is how visualizations of uncertainty influence understanding amongst the intended, potentially varied, target audiences. End-users have a wide range of differing expertise and backgrounds, possibly influencing the decision-making process they undertake for a given forecast presentation. Our previous, Part 1 study (Mulder et al., 2023) examined how the presentation of uncertainty information influenced end-user decision making. Here, we shift the focus to examine the decisions and reactions of participants with differing areas of expertise (meteorology, psychology, and graphic-communication students) when presented with varied hypothetical forecast representations (boxplot, fan plot, or spaghetti plot with and without median lines) using the same eye-tracking methods and experiments. Participants made decisions about a fictional scenario involving the choices between ships of different sizes in the face of varying ice thickness forecasts. Eye movements to the graph area and key and how they changed over time (early, intermediate, and later viewing periods) were examined. More fixations (maintained gaze on one location) and more fixation time were spent on the graph and key during early and intermediate periods of viewing, particularly for boxplots and fan plots. The inclusion of median lines led to less fixations being made on all graph types during early and intermediate viewing periods. No difference in eye movement behaviour was found due to expertise; however, those with greater expertise were more accurate in their decisions, particularly during more difficult scenarios. Where scientific producers seek to draw users to the central estimate, an anchoring line can significantly reduce cognitive load, leading both experts and non-experts to make more rational decisions. When asking users to consider extreme scenarios or uncertainty, different prior expertise can lead to significantly different cognitive loads for processing information, with an impact on one's ability to make appropriate decisions.

Magnitude Judgements Are Influenced by the Relative Positions of Data Points Within Axis Limits

Numerosity Adaptation along the Y-Axis Affects Numerosity Perception along the X-Axis: Does Numerosity Adaptation Activate MNLs?

Exocentric Reference Frames Determine 2D Orientation Bias

Perceived Azimuth Direction is Exaggerated: Converging Evidence from Explicit and Implicit Measures

Large Perceptual Distortions of Locomotor Action Space Occur in Ground-Based Coordinates: Angular Expansion and the Large-Scale Horizontal-Vertical Illusion.

Slant Perception in Near Space is Categorically Biased: Evidence for a Vertical Tendency

ANGULAR OVERESTIMATION ENHANCES CODING PRECISION: SCALE EXPANSION THEORY IN SLANT PERCEPTION

Using dynamic circles and squares to visualize spatio-temporal variation

Truncating the Y-Axis: Threat or Menace?

Scale matters: risk perception, return expectations, and investment propensity under different scalings

Cross-dimensional Magnitude Interactions Reflect Statistical Correlations among Physical Dimensions: Evidence from Space-Time Interaction

Observers Efficiently Extract the Minimal and Maximal Element in Perceptual Magnitude Sets: Evidence for a Bipartite Format

Same Data, Diverging Perspectives: The Power of Visualizations to Elicit Competing Interpretations

Impact of Vertical Scaling on Normal Probability Density Function Plots

Depth Compression Based on Mis-Scaling of Binocular Disparity May Contribute to Angular Expansion in Perceived Optical Slant.

Human Judgment of Relative-Frequency Adapts to the Environmental Statistics Via Non-Linear Sequential Effects

Magnitude processing and integration entail perceptual processes independent from the task

The Arrangement of Marks Impacts Afforded Messages: Ordering, Partitioning, Spacing, and Coloring in Bar Charts

When is More Better?

Exploring bias in horizontal and vertical spatial representations using mental number lines and the greyscales task

Understanding representations of uncertainty, an eye-tracking study – Part 2: The effect of expertise