A cross‐cultural study of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment for people with hearing impairment
Stacey Theocharous,Greg Savage,Anna Pavlina Charalambous,Mathieu Côté,Renaud David,Kathleen Gallant,Catherine Helmer,Robert Laforce,Iracema Leroi,Ralph N. Martins,Ziad Nasreddine,Antonis Politis,David Reeves,Gregor Russell,Marie‐Josée Sirois,Hamid R. Sohrabi,Chyrssoula Thodi,Christiane Völter,Wai Kent Yeung,Piers Dawes
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19020
2024-06-09
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Abstract:Background Cognitive screening tools enable the detection of cognitive impairment, facilitate timely intervention, inform clinical care, and allow long‐term planning. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment for people with hearing impairment (MoCA‐H) was developed as a reliable cognitive screening tool for people with hearing loss. Using the same methodology across four languages, this study examined whether cultural or linguistic factors affect the performance of the MoCA‐H. Methods The current study investigated the performance of the MoCA‐H across English, German, French, and Greek language groups (n = 385) controlling for demographic factors known to affect the performance of the MoCA‐H. Results In a multiple regression model accounting for age, sex, and education, cultural–linguistic group accounted for 6.89% of variance in the total MoCA‐H score. Differences between languages in mean score of up to 2.6 points were observed. Conclusions Cultural or linguistic factors have a clinically significant impact on the performance of the MoCA‐H such that optimal performance cut points for identification of cognitive impairment derived in English‐speaking populations are likely inappropriate for use in non‐English speaking populations. To ensure reliable identification of cognitive impairment, it is essential that locally appropriate performance cut points are established for each translation of the MoCA‐H.
geriatrics & gerontology,gerontology