Using social media as an institutional resource: implications for the clinical nurse specialist.
A. Barton
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NUR.0b013e31821577ac
2011-05-01
Abstract:Social media consists of a variety of online tools that share thefollowingcharacteristics:participation,openness, conversation, community, and connectedness. The 7 common types of social media are social networks (eg, Facebook, LinkedIn), blogs, wikis, podcasts, forums, content communities (eg, del.icio.us), and microblogging (eg, Twitter). Two recent reports have highlighted the use of social media in the context of health. The purpose of this article is to review the current use of social media within health care, provide implications for the role of the clinical nurse specialist (CNS), and highlight policy considerations for health care institutions. The Pew Research Center released a report, ‘‘The Social Side of the Internet,’’ which highlights the impact that technology is having on social and civic group interactions and their influencewithin communities. The survey, based on telephone interviews with 2303 adults across the United States, indicates that 68% of those surveyed (both Internet and non-internet users) said the Internet has had a major impact on the ability of groups to communicate with their members. Furthermore, 62% cite the effectiveness of the Internet to draw attention to an issue; 60% find a major impact with groups connecting to other groups, whereas 59% report a major impact on society at large for the ability to organize activities. For those who are active members of groups, they cited use of social media as an important tool. The types of groups where social media users are more likely to be active are consumer groups (24%), sports or recreation groups (24%), charitable or volunteer organizations (22%), professional or trade organizations (20%), community or neighborhood groups (19%), and, of interest to the health community, support groups for patients with illness (18%). The second report fromManhattanResearch,Cybercitizen Health US, documents the substantial growth in the number of adults accessing social media for health purposes. In 2010, an estimated 89 million Americans accessed social media for health purposes, compared with 63 million in 2008 and 35 million in 2007. Furthermore, use of social media for health purposes is influenced more with disease type, such as cancer, than it is for age, as occurs with social media use by individuals in broader society. Although the benefits of using social media to reach patients seem obvious, there is concern among corporate leaders that an analysis of the concurrent risks must also be considered. Russell Herder and Ethos Business Law prepared a report analyzing the advantages and liabilities associated with the use of social media as a corporate communications strategy. They identified that many corporations are using social media in a reactive versus proactive manner by monitoring what customers are saying andwhat competitors may be doing. They suggest that using social media can be a solid corporate strategy for communications, but creating appropriate policies and rules of engagement for employees is necessary. An analysis of corporate social media policies indicated that only about one-third of organizations (37%) use a proactive strategy, whereas 48% take a neutral stance (focusing on the known), and 15% are more restrictive (focusing on averting risk). However, given the CNS’s role in patient education and outreach as well as the number of adults using social media for health care purposes, how can the CNS be more involved with crafting an appropriate corporate strategy? Fortunately, there is a myriad of resources available to assist with development of policies and guidelines to facilitate innovative Author Affiliations: College of Nursing, University of Colorado, Denver. Correspondence: Amy J. Barton, PhD, RN, FAAN, 13120 East 19th Ave., MSC288-5, Aurora, CO 80045 (Amy.barton@ucdenver.edu). DOI: 10.1097/NUR.0b013e31821577ac