Abstract:Purpose Prediction is a critical task in targeted online advertising, where predictions better than random guessing can translate to real economic return. This study aims to use machine learning (ML) methods to identify individuals who respond well to certain linguistic styles/persuasion techniques based on Aristotle's means of persuasion, rhetorical devices, cognitive theories and Cialdini's principles, given their psychometric profile. Design/methodology/approach A total of 1,022 individuals took part in the survey; participants were asked to fill out the ten item personality measure questionnaire to capture personality traits and the dysfunctional attitude scale (DAS) to measure dysfunctional beliefs and cognitive vulnerabilities. ML classification models using participant profiling information as input were developed to predict the extent to which an individual was influenced by statements that contained different linguistic styles/persuasion techniques. Several ML algorithms were used including support vector machine, LightGBM and Auto-Sklearn to predict the effect of each technique given each individual's profile (personality, belief system and demographic data). Findings The findings highlight the importance of incorporating emotion-based variables as model input in predicting the influence of textual statements with embedded persuasion techniques. Across all investigated models, the influence effect could be predicted with an accuracy ranging 53%–70%, indicating the importance of testing multiple ML algorithms in the development of a persuasive communication (PC) system. The classification ability of models was highest when predicting the response to statements using rhetorical devices and flattery persuasion techniques. Contrastingly, techniques such as authority or social proof were less predictable. Adding DAS scale features improved model performance, suggesting they may be important in modelling persuasion. Research limitations/implications In this study, the survey was limited to English-speaking countries and largely Western society values. More work is needed to ascertain the efficacy of models for other populations, cultures and languages. Most PC efforts are targeted at groups such as users, clients, shoppers and voters with this study in the communication context of education – further research is required to explore the capability of predictive ML models in other contexts. Finally, long self-reported psychological questionnaires may not be suitable for real-world deployment and could be subject to bias, thus a simpler method needs to be devised to gather user profile data such as using a subset of the most predictive features. Practical implications The findings of this study indicate that leveraging richer profiling data in conjunction with ML approaches may assist in the development of enhanced persuasive systems. There are many applications such as online apps, digital advertising, recommendation systems, chatbots and e-commerce platforms which can benefit from integrating persuasion communication systems that tailor messaging to the individual – potentially translating into higher economic returns. Originality/value This study integrates sets of features that have heretofore not been used together in developing ML-based predictive models of PC. DAS scale data, which relate to dysfunctional beliefs and cognitive vulnerabilities, were assessed for their importance in identifying effective persuasion techniques. Additionally, the work compares a range of persuasion techniques that thus far have only been studied separately. This study also demonstrates the application of various ML methods in predicting the influence of linguistic styles/persuasion techniques within textual statements and show that a robust methodology comparing a range of ML algorithms is important in the discovery of a performant model.

Unveiling the link between logical fallacies and web persuasion

Robust and Explainable Identification of Logical Fallacies in Natural Language Arguments

Using the elaboration likelihood model to examine online persuasion through website design

Evaluation of an LLM in Identifying Logical Fallacies: A Call for Rigor When Adopting LLMs in HCI Research

Flee the Flaw: Annotating the Underlying Logic of Fallacious Arguments Through Templates and Slot-filling

On the Interplay Between Interpretation and Reasoning in Compelling Fallacies

A robot's sense-making of fallacies and rhetorical tropes. Creating ontologies of what humans try to say

Bringing Order to the Cognitive Fallacy Zoo

Persua: A Visual Interactive System to Enhance the Persuasiveness of Arguments in Online Discussion

Susceptibility to poor arguments: The interplay of cognitive sophistication and attitudes

On the Conversational Persuasiveness of Large Language Models: A Randomized Controlled Trial

How susceptible are LLMs to Logical Fallacies?

A Logical Fallacy-Informed Framework for Argument Generation

Theme Aspect Argumentation Model for Handling Fallacies

Is it morally acceptable for a system to lie to persuade me?

Persuasive communication systems: a machine learning approach to predict the effect of linguistic styles and persuasion techniques

Deciphering Deception: How Different Rhetoric of AI Language Impacts Users' Sense of Truth in LLMs

Strategic Argumentation Dialogues for Persuasion: Framework and Experiments Based on Modelling the Beliefs and Concerns of the Persuadee

Persuasive technology for enhanced learning behavior in higher education

Developing persuasive systems for marketing: the interplay of persuasion techniques, customer traits and persuasive message design

Detecting Fallacies in Climate Misinformation: A Technocognitive Approach to Identifying Misleading Argumentation