Abstract:coding andrepresentation inneural systemaredetermined by spatio-temporal interaction of synapses. Spike-timing dependent plasticity(STDP) shows synaptic efficacy and information transfer are highly dependent ontherelative timing (about± 50ms) ofthepre-and postsynaptic spikes andtheir interactional patterns. Inthis article, wesuggest anewformula ofsynaptic plasticity based onSTDP.We select H-RandDIFaspre-andpostsynaptic neuronmodelrespectively andsimulate threefundamental interactional patterns. Then,we consider plastic similarity betweenthelevel ofbehavior andneuronsduetothe aggregation ofrepetitive stimulations. Finally, weexplore some implications ofSTDPonthestability ofneural network. I.INTRODUCTION Information received bytheneuron viasynaptic inputs is integrated byspatial andtemporal summation ofexcitatory andinhibitory synaptic potentials atthedendrite. Inthepast, temporal summation hasbeeninterpreted asarequirement ofcoincidence, summarized inthepopular mnemonics: cells that fire together, wiretogether (Shatz, Zigmond et al.1999). Overthepastseveral years, there hasbeen increasing interest inanovel extension toHebbian synaptic plasticity called spike-timing dependent plasticity (STDP), andtherecent experimental andtheoretical evidence also showthat relative timing ofpre- andpostsynaptic spikes can becritical forthedirection andmagnitude ofplastic change, inwhich both potentiation anddepression occur atsynapses obeysuchSTDP learning rules, namely, synaptic modification depends on variations of onlya few milliseconds intherelative timing ofpre- andpostsynaptic spikes during theperiod ofassociation. Theseresults challenge theconventional understanding ofHebb's rule andraise intriguing questions regarding thefundamental processes ofspike trains. Thefirst section ofthis paper reviews Hebbian synaptic plasticity andrecent experimental finding aboutSTDP, whichistemporally asymmetric. Inthis section, wealso summarize possible temporal integration andweight dependent rule ofSTDP.Inthesecond part ofthepaper, we propose abiologically reasonable learning algorithm based onSTDPandimplement relative computational models. Finally, wediscuss howSTDPshedlight onthestability of biological neural network. This paper isamodest step inthedirection, inwhich we modify Hebbian rule tomakeheuristic learning algorithm andsimulate three fundamental interactional patterns which areplausible consistent withempirical observations.

From STDP towards Biologically Plausible Deep Learning

Time-Integrated Spike-Timing-Dependent-Plasticity

Memory-Efficient Synaptic Connectivity for Spike-Timing- Dependent Plasticity

Input Synchrony and Spike-Timing Dependent Plasticity

BP-STDP: Approximating backpropagation using spike timing dependent plasticity

Toward Efficient Processing and Learning with Spikes: New Approaches for Multispike Learning

A New Formula Ofsynaptic Plasticity Based on STDP Anditsimplications

Temporal Modulation of Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity

Deep Unsupervised Learning Using Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity

Robustness of STDP to Spike Timing Jitter.

A Stochastic Approach to STDP

SSTDP: Supervised Spike Timing Dependent Plasticity for Efficient Spiking Neural Network Training

MSTDP: A More Biologically Plausible Learning

Spatial representation of temporal information through spike timing dependent plasticity

Towards Biologically Plausible Deep Learning

A framework for studying synaptic plasticity with neural spike train data

Optical Spike-Timing-dependent Plasticity with Weight-Dependent Learning Window and Reward Modulation.

Spike-Timing-Dependent Back Propagation in Deep Spiking Neural Networks.

Spike-timing-dependent plasticity: common themes and divergent vistas

A history of spike-timing-dependent plasticity

Biophysical And Phenomenological Models Of Multiple Spike Interactions In Spike-Timing Dependent Plasticity