Abstract:coding andrepresentation inneural systemaredetermined by spatio-temporal interaction of synapses. Spike-timing dependent plasticity(STDP) shows synaptic efficacy and information transfer are highly dependent ontherelative timing (about± 50ms) ofthepre-and postsynaptic spikes andtheir interactional patterns. Inthis article, wesuggest anewformula ofsynaptic plasticity based onSTDP.We select H-RandDIFaspre-andpostsynaptic neuronmodelrespectively andsimulate threefundamental interactional patterns. Then,we consider plastic similarity betweenthelevel ofbehavior andneuronsduetothe aggregation ofrepetitive stimulations. Finally, weexplore some implications ofSTDPonthestability ofneural network. I.INTRODUCTION Information received bytheneuron viasynaptic inputs is integrated byspatial andtemporal summation ofexcitatory andinhibitory synaptic potentials atthedendrite. Inthepast, temporal summation hasbeeninterpreted asarequirement ofcoincidence, summarized inthepopular mnemonics: cells that fire together, wiretogether (Shatz, Zigmond et al.1999). Overthepastseveral years, there hasbeen increasing interest inanovel extension toHebbian synaptic plasticity called spike-timing dependent plasticity (STDP), andtherecent experimental andtheoretical evidence also showthat relative timing ofpre- andpostsynaptic spikes can becritical forthedirection andmagnitude ofplastic change, inwhich both potentiation anddepression occur atsynapses obeysuchSTDP learning rules, namely, synaptic modification depends on variations of onlya few milliseconds intherelative timing ofpre- andpostsynaptic spikes during theperiod ofassociation. Theseresults challenge theconventional understanding ofHebb's rule andraise intriguing questions regarding thefundamental processes ofspike trains. Thefirst section ofthis paper reviews Hebbian synaptic plasticity andrecent experimental finding aboutSTDP, whichistemporally asymmetric. Inthis section, wealso summarize possible temporal integration andweight dependent rule ofSTDP.Inthesecond part ofthepaper, we propose abiologically reasonable learning algorithm based onSTDPandimplement relative computational models. Finally, wediscuss howSTDPshedlight onthestability of biological neural network. This paper isamodest step inthedirection, inwhich we modify Hebbian rule tomakeheuristic learning algorithm andsimulate three fundamental interactional patterns which areplausible consistent withempirical observations.

Spatial representation of temporal information through spike timing dependent plasticity

Time-Integrated Spike-Timing-Dependent-Plasticity

Temporal Modulation of Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity

Input Synchrony and Spike-Timing Dependent Plasticity

Precise-Spike-Driven Synaptic Plasticity: Learning Hetero-Association of Spatiotemporal Spike Patterns

Spike-timing-dependent plasticity: common themes and divergent vistas

A New Formula Ofsynaptic Plasticity Based on STDP Anditsimplications

A history of spike-timing-dependent plasticity

Learning of Precise Spike Times with Membrane Potential Dependent Synaptic Plasticity

Robustness of STDP to Spike Timing Jitter.

Pattern Recognition Computation in a Spiking Neural Network with Temporal Encoding and Learning

STDP-based Associative Memory Formation and Retrieval

Spiking-timing based pattern recognition with real-world visual stimuli

Unsupervised Learning of Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity Based on a Neuromorphic Implementation

Temporal Competitive Learning Induced in Neural Networks by Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity

Magnetic Resonance Force Microscopy Measurement of Entangled Spin States

Associative learning based on symmetric spike time dependent plasticity

Incremental Self-Organization of Spatio-Temporal Spike Pattern Detection

Learning spatiotemporal signals using a recurrent spiking network that discretizes time

Temporal Asymmetry in Spike Timing-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity

Cooperation of Spike Timing-Dependent and Heterosynaptic Plasticities in Neural Networks: A Fokker-Planck Approach