Abstract:Several computer programs are available for detecting copy number variants (CNVs) using genome-wide SNP arrays. We evaluated the performance of four CNV detection software suites-Birdsuite, Partek, HelixTree, and PennCNV-Affy-in the identification of both rare and common CNVs. Each program's performance was assessed in two ways. The first was its recovery rate, i.e., its ability to call 893 CNVs previously identified in eight HapMap samples by paired-end sequencing of whole-genome fosmid clones, and 51,440 CNVs identified by array Comparative Genome Hybridization (aCGH) followed by validation procedures, in 90 HapMap CEU samples. The second evaluation was program performance calling rare and common CNVs in the Bipolar Genome Study (BiGS) data set (1001 bipolar cases and 1033 controls, all of European ancestry) as measured by the Affymetrix SNP 6.0 array. Accuracy in calling rare CNVs was assessed by positive predictive value, based on the proportion of rare CNVs validated by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), while accuracy in calling common CNVs was assessed by false positive/false negative rates based on qPCR validation results from a subset of common CNVs. Birdsuite recovered the highest percentages of known HapMap CNVs containing >20 markers in two reference CNV datasets. The recovery rate increased with decreased CNV frequency. In the tested rare CNV data, Birdsuite and Partek had higher positive predictive values than the other software suites. In a test of three common CNVs in the BiGS dataset, Birdsuite's call was 98.8% consistent with qPCR quantification in one CNV region, but the other two regions showed an unacceptable degree of accuracy. We found relatively poor consistency between the two "gold standards,'' the sequence data of Kidd et al., and aCGH data of Conrad et al. Algorithms for calling CNVs especially common ones need substantial improvement, and a "gold standard'' for detection of CNVs remains to be established.

GCphase: an SNP phasing method using a graph partition and error correction algorithm

Accuracy Of Cnv Detection From Gwas Data

Accelerating Haplotype-Based Genome-Wide Association Study Using Perfect Phylogeny and Phase-Known Reference Data

nPhase: an accurate and contiguous phasing method for polyploids

HiPhase: jointly phasing small, structural, and tandem repeat variants from HiFi sequencing

FNphasing: a novel fast heuristic algorithm for haplotype phasing based on flow network model.

Using readmers and hapmers in assessing phase switching after read error correction of Oxford Nanopore Sequences

Large-scale Genotyping of Complex DNA

PolyCluster: Minimum Fragment Disagreement Clustering for Polyploid Phasing

Simultaneous de novo calling and phasing of genetic variants at chromosome-scale using NanoStrand-seq

A general approach to single-nucleotide polymorphism discovery

StarPhase: Comprehensive Phase-Aware Pharmacogenomic Diplotyper for Long-Read Sequencing Data

A General Approach for Haplotype Phasing across the Full Spectrum of Relatedness

[Analysis and Application of SNP and Haplotype in the Human Genome].

Plant sperm cell sequencing for genome phasing and determination of meiotic crossover points

KSNP: a fast de Bruijn graph-based haplotyping tool approaching data-in time cost

Graphasing: phasing diploid genome assembly graphs with single-cell strand sequencing

Hybridization and Amplification Rate Correction for Affymetrix SNP Arrays

Algorithms for Computational Genetic Epidemiology

Phased nanopore assembly with Shasta and modular graph phasing with GFAse

Dynamic Programming Algorithms for Haplotype Block Partitioning and Tag SNP Selection Using Haplotype Data or Genotype Data