Abstract:Background The theoretical basis of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) is statistical inference of linkage disequilibrium (LD) between any polymorphic marker and a putative disease locus. Most methods widely implemented for such analyses are vulnerable to several key demographic factors and deliver a poor statistical power for detecting genuine associations and also a high false positive rate. Here, we present a likelihood-based statistical approach that accounts properly for non-random nature of case–control samples in regard of genotypic distribution at the loci in populations under study and confers flexibility to test for genetic association in presence of different confounding factors such as population structure, non-randomness of samples etc. Results We implemented this novel method together with several popular methods in the literature of GWAS, to re-analyze recently published Parkinson’s disease (PD) case–control samples. The real data analysis and computer simulation show that the new method confers not only significantly improved statistical power for detecting the associations but also robustness to the difficulties stemmed from non-randomly sampling and genetic structures when compared to its rivals. In particular, the new method detected 44 significant SNPs within 25 chromosomal regions of size < 1 Mb but only 6 SNPs in two of these regions were previously detected by the trend test based methods. It discovered two SNPs located 1.18 Mb and 0.18 Mb from the PD candidates, FGF20 and PARK8 , without invoking false positive risk. Conclusions We developed a novel likelihood-based method which provides adequate estimation of LD and other population model parameters by using case and control samples, the ease in integration of these samples from multiple genetically divergent populations and thus confers statistically robust and powerful analyses of GWAS. On basis of simulation studies and analysis of real datasets, we demonstrated significant improvement of the new method over the non-parametric trend test, which is the most popularly implemented in the literature of GWAS.

Accelerating Haplotype-Based Genome-Wide Association Study Using Perfect Phylogeny and Phase-Known Reference Data

MaCH: using sequence and genotype data to estimate haplotypes and unobserved genotypes

WinHAP: an Efficient Haplotype Phasing Algorithm Based on Scalable Sliding Windows.

High-accuracy haplotype imputation using unphased genotype data as the references

Accurate Haplotype Inference for Multiple Linked Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms Using Sibship Data

A Fast Haplotype Inference Method for Large Population Genotype Data

Comprehensive Structural Variant Haplotype Panel of 943 Han Chinese from Long-Read Whole-Genome Sequencing

A Robust and Efficient Statistical Method for Genetic Association Studies Using Case and Control Samples from Multiple Cohorts

WinHAP2: an extremely fast haplotype phasing program for long genotype sequences

A Fast and Flexible Statistical Model for Large-Scale Population Genotype Data: Applications to Inferring Missing Genotypes and Haplotypic Phase

Large-scale Genotyping of Complex DNA

Comparison of haplotype inference methods using genotypic data from unrelated individuals.

A high-resolution haplotype-resolved Reference panel constructed from the China Kadoorie Biobank Study

Univariate/Multivariate Genome-Wide Association Scans Using Data from Families and Unrelated Samples

Fast and accurate haplotype inference with hidden markov model

High-throughput and Efficient Multilocus Genome-Wide Association Study on Longitudinal Outcomes.

Robust Reference Powered Association Test of Genome-Wide Association Studies

Inferring Haplotype/disease Association by Joint Use of Case-Parents Trios and Case-Parent Pairs.

Efficient Multivariate Analysis Algorithms for Longitudinal Genome-wide Association Studies

Two-phase sample selection strategies for design and analysis in post-genome-wide association fine-mapping studies

Searching Genome-Wide Multi-Locus Associations for Multiple Diseases Based on Bayesian Inference.