The thin red line: Blood planning factors and the enduring need for a robust military blood system to support combat operations
Jennifer M. Gurney,Andrew P. Cap,John B. Holcomb,Amanda M. Staudt,Matthew D. Tadlock,Travis M. Polk,Crystal Davis,Jason B. Corley,Martin A. Schreiber,Andrew Beckett,Mary Ann Spott,Stacy A. Shackelford,Jan-Michael Van Gent,Jonathan D. Stallings,Matthew J. Martin,Leslie E. Riggs
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0000000000004413
2024-07-14
Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
Abstract:Battlefield lessons learned are forgotten; the current name for this is the Walker Dip. Blood transfusion and the need for a Department of Defense Blood Program are lessons that have cycled through being learned during wartime, forgotten, and then relearned during the next war. The military will always need a blood program to support combat and contingency operations. Also, blood supply to the battlefield has planning factors that have been consistent over a century. In 2024, it is imperative that we codify these lessons learned. The linchpins of modern combat casualty care are optimal prehospital care, early whole blood transfusion, and forward surgical care. This current opinion comprised of authors from all three military Services, the Joint Trauma System, the Armed Services Blood Program, blood SMEs and the CCC Research Program discuss two vital necessities for a successful military trauma system: (1) the need for an Armed Services Blood Program and (2) Planning factors for current and future deployed military ere is no effective care for wounded soldiers, and by extension there is no effective military medicine.
surgery,critical care medicine