A Comprehensive Signal Quality Assessment for BDS/Galileo/GPS Satellites and Signals

Yijun Tian,Guorui Xiao,Rui Guo,Dongqing Zhao,Lu Zhang,Jie Xin,Jinglei Guo,Yuechao Han,Xuefan Du,Donghan He,Zheng Qin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16132277
IF: 5
2024-06-22
Remote Sensing
Abstract:With the modernization of global navigation satellite systems (GNSS), especially the rapid development of the BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS), more observations of satellites and signals have become available. Using data of the globally distributed MGEX stations, a systematic and comprehensive evaluation of signal characteristics for BDS−3, BDS−2, GPS, and Galileo is conducted in terms of carrier−to−noise ratio (C/N0), code noise, and multipath in the contribution. First, a comprehensive signal quality assessment method for BDS/Galileo/GPS satellites and signals is proposed, including C/N0 modeling and MP modeling. For BDS, the BDS−3 satellites apparently have higher signal power than the BDS−2 satellites at the same frequency such as B1I and B3I, and the signal B2a of BDS−3 is superior to other signals in regard to signal power, which is comparable with the superior Galileo E5 signals and GPS L5. Among all the signals, the observation accuracy of E5 is the highest regardless of receiver types,, and next highest are BDS−3 B2a and GPS L5. Due to not being affected by the systematic code errors of BDS−2, the observations of BDS−3 satellites contain smaller multipath errors than that of BDS−2 satellites. As for the multipath suppression performance, the BDS−3 signal B2a, GPS L5, and Galileo E5 and E5b perform better than the other signals, which may be related to their wide signal bandwidths.
environmental sciences,imaging science & photographic technology,remote sensing,geosciences, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the Paper Aims to Solve This paper aims to comprehensively evaluate the signal quality of the BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS), Galileo, and the Global Positioning System (GPS). Specifically, the main objectives of the study include: 1. **Signal Power Evaluation**: - Compare the signal power of different satellite types at the same frequency through carrier-to-noise ratio (C/N0) modeling. - Compare the signal power of different signals, particularly the differences in signal power between BeiDou-3 (BDS-3) and BeiDou-2 (BDS-2). 2. **Code Noise Evaluation**: - Evaluate code noise by eliminating the geometric term through the method of pseudorange minus carrier phase. - Analyze the code noise levels of different signals under different receiver types. 3. **Multipath Error Evaluation**: - Construct multipath combinations to evaluate the multipath errors of different signals. - Compare the performance of different satellites and signals in terms of multipath suppression. ### Research Background With the modernization of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS), especially the rapid development of the BeiDou system, more satellite and signal observation data have become available. This paper utilizes data from globally distributed MGEX stations to systematically and comprehensively evaluate the signal characteristics of BDS-3, BDS-2, GPS, and Galileo, focusing mainly on carrier-to-noise ratio (C/N0), code noise, and multipath errors. ### Main Findings 1. **Signal Power**: - The signal power of BDS-3 satellites at the same frequency is significantly higher than that of BDS-2 satellites, especially in the B1I and B3I bands. - The B2a signal of BDS-3 outperforms other signals in terms of signal power, comparable to Galileo E5 and GPS L5 signals. 2. **Code Noise**: - Pseudorange noise is related to the satellite elevation angle; the higher the satellite elevation angle, the lower the noise. - The B2a signal of BDS-3 performs best in terms of noise level, followed by the B1I and B3I signals. 3. **Multipath Error**: - The multipath error of BDS-3 satellites is smaller and is not affected by the systematic code error present in the BDS-2 system. - The B2a signal of BDS-3, GPS L5 signal, and Galileo E5 signal perform well in multipath suppression, which may be related to their wide signal bandwidth. ### Conclusion Through a comprehensive evaluation of BDS, Galileo, and GPS signals, the study finds that BDS-3 satellites perform excellently in terms of signal power, code noise, and multipath errors, especially the B2a signal. These results contribute to further improving the accuracy, reliability, and availability of multi-system integrated positioning services.