Abstract:Abstract Objectives To answer a national research priority by comparing the risk-benefit and costs associated with reverse total shoulder replacement (RTSR) and anatomical total shoulder replacement (TSR) in patients having elective primary shoulder replacement for osteoarthritis. Design Population based cohort study using data from the National Joint Registry and Hospital Episode Statistics for England. Setting Public hospitals and publicly funded procedures at private hospitals in England, 2012-20. Participants Adults aged 60 years or older who underwent RTSR or TSR for osteoarthritis with intact rotator cuff tendons. Patients were identified from the National Joint Registry and linked to NHS Hospital Episode Statistics and civil registration mortality data. Propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting were used to balance the study groups. Main outcome measures The main outcome measure was revision surgery. Secondary outcome measures included serious adverse events within 90 days, reoperations within 12 months, prolonged hospital stay (more than three nights), change in Oxford Shoulder Score (preoperative to six month postoperative), and lifetime costs to the healthcare service. Results The propensity score matched population comprised 7124 RTSR or TSR procedures (126 were revised), and the inverse probability of treatment weighted population comprised 12 968 procedures (294 were revised) with a maximum follow-up of 8.75 years. RTSR had a reduced hazard ratio of revision in the first three years (hazard ratio local minimum 0.33, 95% confidence interval 0.18 to 0.59) with no clinically important difference in revision-free restricted mean survival time, and a reduced relative risk of reoperations at 12 months (odds ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.25 to 0.83) with an absolute risk difference of −0.51% (95% confidence interval −0.89 to −0.13). Serious adverse events and prolonged hospital stay risks, change in Oxford Shoulder Score, and modelled mean lifetime costs were similar. Outcomes remained consistent after weighting. Conclusions This study’s findings provide reassurance that RTSR is an acceptable alternative to TSR for patients aged 60 years or older with osteoarthritis and intact rotator cuff tendons. Despite a significant difference in the risk profiles of revision surgery over time, no statistically significant and clinically important differences between RTSR and TSR were found in terms of long term revision surgery, serious adverse events, reoperations, prolonged hospital stay, or lifetime healthcare costs.

Total elbow replacement in England: a protocol for analysis of National Joint Registry and Hospital Episode Statistics data

Can we develop consensus on long-term follow-up and surveillance of primary shoulder arthroplasty? A study protocol using a real-time Delphi technique among expert clinicians in the UK

Epidemiology of primary and revision total knee arthroplasty: analysis of demographics, comorbidities and outcomes from the national inpatient sample

Revision total knee replacement finances: a detailed cost-analysis of operative practice at a regional tertiary referral centre

REducing unwarranted variation in the Delivery of high qUality hip fraCture services in England and Wales (REDUCE): protocol for a mixed-methods study

Reverse total shoulder replacement versus anatomical total shoulder replacement for osteoarthritis: population based cohort study using data from the National Joint Registry and Hospital Episode Statistics for England

The clinical and cost-effectiveness of elective primary total knee replacement with PAtellar Resurfacing compared to selective patellar resurfacing: a pragmatic multicentre randomized controlled Trial (PART)

International primary hip arthroplasty registry review: findings from current reports

Elbow Arthroplasty Utilization in 2060: Projections of Utilization of Primary and Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty in United States in the Next 40 years

Setting benchmark revision rates for total hip replacement: analysis of registry evidence

A comprehensive joint replacement program for total knee arthroplasty: a descriptive study

Estimated Carbon Savings from Changing Surgical Trends in Primary Elective Total Hip Arthroplasty in England: A Retrospective Observational Study

Deriving literature-based benchmarks for surgical complications in high-income countries: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Implementation of the New Medicare-Mandated Patient Reported Outcomes After Joint Arthroplasty Performance Measure

Management of the exposed total knee prosthesis, a six-year review

Introducing Virtual Prehabilitation to a UK Elective Total Hip Replacement service to improve patient outcomes: An overview of the literature and proposed implementation plan

Hemiarthroplasty compared with total hip arthroplasty in fractured neck of femur: a shift in national practice?

Outcomes of total knee replacement versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol

National practice patterns for the care of the patient with total joint replacement

Global Trends in Patellar Resurfacing From 2004 to 2022

Incidence of and Risk Factors for Reoperation and Revision Following Total Elbow Arthroplasty with an Anatomic Convertible Prosthesis