Abstract:BACKGROUND: Revision THA and TKA are growing and important clinical and economic challenges. Healthcare systems tend to combine revision joint replacement procedures into a single service line, and differences between revision THA and revision TKA remain incompletely characterized. These differences carry implications for guiding care and resource allocation. We therefore evaluated epidemiologic trends associated with revision THAs and TKAs.QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We sought to determine differences in (1) the number of patients undergoing revision TKA and THA and respective demographic trends; (2) differences in the indications for and types of revision TKA and THA; (3) differences in patient severity of illness scoring between THA and TKA; and (4) differences in resource utilization (including cost and length of stay [LOS]) between revision THA and TKA.METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) was used to evaluate 235,857 revision THAs and 301,718 revision TKAs between October 1, 2005 and December 31, 2010. Patient characteristics, procedure information, and resource utilization were compared across revision THAs and TKAs. A revision burden (ratio of number of revisions to total number of revision and primary surgeries) was calculated for hip and knee procedures. Severity of illness scoring and cost calculations were derived from the NIS. As our study was principally descriptive, statistical analyses generally were not performed; however, owing to the large sample size available to us through this NIS analysis, even small observed differences presented are likely to be highly statistically significant.RESULTS: Revision TKAs increased by 39% (revision burden, 9.1%-9.6%) and THAs increased by 23% (revision burden, 15.4%-14.6%). Revision THAs were performed more often in older patients compared with revision TKAs. Periprosthetic joint infection (25%) and mechanical loosening (19%) were the most common reasons for revision TKA compared with dislocation (22%) and mechanical loosening (20%) for revision THA. Full (all-component) revision was more common in revision THAs (43%) than in TKAs (37%). Patients who underwent revision THA generally were sicker (> 50% major severity of illness score) than patients who underwent revision TKA (65% moderate severity of illness score). Mean LOS was longer for revision THAs than for TKAs. Mean hospitalization costs were slightly higher for revision THA (USD 24,697 +/- USD 40,489 [SD]) than revision TKA (USD 23,130 +/- USD 36,643 [SD]). Periprosthetic joint infection and periprosthetic fracture were associated with the greatest LOS and costs for revision THAs and TKAs.CONCLUSIONS: These data could prove important for healthcare systems to appropriately allocate resources to hip and knee procedures: the revision burden for THA is 52% greater than for TKA, but revision TKAs are increasing at a faster rate. Likewise, the treating clinician should understand that while both revision THAs and TKAs bear significant clinical and economic costs, patients undergoing revision THA tend to be older, sicker, and have greater costs of care.

Revision total knee replacement finances: a detailed cost-analysis of operative practice at a regional tertiary referral centre

A Systematic Approach to Predicting the Risk of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Revision.

Cost of Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty at a Tertiary Medical Center

Revision Surgery in Total Joint Replacement Is Cost-Intensive

Inpatient Hospital Costs, Emergency Department Visits, and Readmissions for Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

Cost of septic and aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

Revision knee replacement surgery in the NHS: A BASK surgical practice guideline

Rising Costs and Diminishing Surgeon Reimbursement From Primary to Revision Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Medicare Advantage and Commercial Insurance

Comparative Epidemiology of Revision Arthroplasty: Failed THA Poses Greater Clinical and Economic Burdens Than Failed TKA

Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty: Predictors of Subsequent Revision Surgery and Economic Burden amongst Medicare Beneficiaries

Similar QALY gain in primary and revision knee arthroplasty: A cost analysis and Markov model

Big data analysis reveals significant increases in complications, costs, and hospital stay in revision total knee arthroplasty compared to primary TKA

Performing Revision Arthroplasty Increases Surgeon and Practice Volumes Through the Generation of Subsequent Cases: A Retrospective Study

Hospital Resource Utilization for Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

Economic burden of surgical management of surgical site infections following hip and knee replacements in Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Racial Disparities in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Analysis of 125,901 Patients in National US Private Payer Database

Early Readmission and Revision After Total Joint Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Cause and Cost

The experience of patients undergoing aseptic, elective revision knee joint replacement surgery: a qualitative study

Revision Arthroplasty Among Medicare Patients in the United States – Arthroplasty Surgeons are Doing More for Less

Accuracy and completeness of registry‐reported unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revision