Abstract:In this paper, we examine whether and how firms’ corporate disclosure policies influence the composition of an analyst’s research portfolio. We find that an analyst will tend to initiate (terminate) coverage of a firm if there is greater (lesser) alignment between: 1) the disclosure policy choices of the firm and the analyst’s disclosure preferences and 2) the disclosure preferences of the other analysts covering the firm and the analyst. The impact of the gap in the disclosure preferences of the analyst and other analysts following the firm is weaker if there is greater dispersion in these analysts’ disclosure preferences. Additionally, the analyst is less (more) likely to initiate (terminate) coverage of the firm if these other analysts are more likely to influence the firm to change its disclosure policies in a direction that will increase the gap between the firm’s disclosure policies and the analyst’s disclosure preferences. As a consequence of these coverage decisions, the dispersion in disclosure policy choices across an analyst’s research portfolio firms significantly decreases with the analyst’s general experience in the research industry. Furthermore, firms tend to align their disclosure policy choices with the preferences of their covering analysts, particularly when there is greater consensus in disclosure preferences among these analysts. These findings provide support for why analysts account for the potential influence effects of existing analysts in their coverage decisions. Our paper suggests that firms’ disclosure policy choices and the influence effects of peer analysts’ disclosure preferences are important considerations in analysts’ coverage decisions.

Causal effect of analyst following on corporate social responsibility

Analyst coverage, corporate social responsibility, and firm risk

Financial analyst coverage and corporate social performance: Evidence from natural experiments

How does analyst coverage influence corporate social responsibility (CSR)? The governance- and information-based perspectives

Financial Analyst Coverage and Corporate Environmental Disclosure

The impact of corporate social responsibility on investment recommendations: Analysts' perceptions and shifting institutional logics

Do Analysts Matter for Governance? Evidence from Natural Experiments

Corporate social responsibility and stock price crash risk: does analyst coverage matter?

Nonfinancial Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting and Firm Value: International Evidence on the Role of Financial Analysts

The Dark Side of Analyst Coverage: the Case of Innovation

The Impact of Analyst Coverage on Corporate Innovation: A Literature Review

Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect Information Asymmetry?

Ownership Structure, Institutional Environment, and the Economic Consequences of Corporate Social Responsibility Information Disclosure: Evidence from Analysts’ Earnings Forecasts

A Meta-Analytic Review of Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Financial Performance

Corporate Social Responsibility Report Narratives and Analyst Forecast Accuracy

Mandatory CSR Disclosure and Analyst Forecast Properties: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China

Is corporate social responsibility constrained by bank credit resource allocation?

Do Affiliated Bankers on Board Enhance Corporate Social Responsibility? US Evidence

Corporate Social Responsibility, Pension Assumptions, and Risky Asset Allocations in Defined Benefit Pension Plans

Analyst Coverage Decisions: The Role of Corporate Disclosure Choices and the Influence Effects of Peer Analysts’ Disclosure Preferences