Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Research Summary</h3><p>To examine whether firms use corporate social responsibility (CSR) to insure against stock price risk, we exploit an exogenous shock in stock price risk associated with Regulation SHO whereby the SEC randomly selected pilot firms for which the uptick restriction on short sales no longer applied. A difference‐in‐differences test reveals that pilot firms increased CSR more than non‐pilot firms and that in particular they reduced CSR concerns and increased CSR that impacts stakeholders involved in direct resource exchange. We also find that pilot firm CSR reduced short positions against them and that the effect is stronger for CSR concerns and CSR that impacts directly‐connected stakeholders. Overall, we document a causal effect of stock price risk on managerial incentives to invest in CSR for risk mitigation.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Managerial Summary</h3><p>CSR has many purported benefits, one of which is that it can insure against the adverse stock price effects of negative events. But do managers purposefully use CSR in this way and do such investments provide intended insurance‐like benefits? By exploiting a natural experiment where a randomly selected set of pilot firms were exposed to elevated short sale risk unleashed by the SEC regulation, we find evidence that they do. Once the SEC initiated the regulatory change, firms that faced greater risk increased CSR more than firms that did not. In addition, increased CSR lowered short interests in pilot firms' stocks and this reduction is attributable to the insurance‐like effect of CSR rather than simply prevention of adverse events.</p><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</p></section>

Financial analyst coverage and corporate social performance: Evidence from natural experiments

Analyst Coverage and Corporate Social Performance: Evidence from China

Financial Analyst Coverage and Corporate Environmental Disclosure

Does Analyst Coverage Affect Corporate ESG Performance? Evidence from China

Analyst Coverage and Corporate ESG Performance

Causal effect of analyst following on corporate social responsibility

Nonfinancial Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting and Firm Value: International Evidence on the Role of Financial Analysts

Do Analysts Matter for Governance? Evidence from Natural Experiments

Analyst coverage, corporate social responsibility, and firm risk

Analyst Coverage and Earnings Management

The Bright Side of Analyst Coverage: Evidence from Stock Price Resilience during COVID-19

Corporate social responsibility and stock price crash risk: does analyst coverage matter?

Analyst Coverage Networks and Corporate Financial Policies

How does analyst coverage influence corporate social responsibility (CSR)? The governance- and information-based perspectives

Corporate financialisation, market attention and analyst tracking

Mandatory CSR Disclosure and Analyst Forecast Properties: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China

Corporate Social Performance, Analyst Stock Recommendations, and Firm Future Returns

Does Environmental Regulation Affect Analyst Forecast Bias? Evidence from China’s Low-Carbon Pilot Policy

A Meta-Analytic Review of Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Financial Performance

The Dark Side of Analyst Coverage: the Case of Innovation

Do firms use corporate social responsibility to insure against stock price risk? Evidence from a natural experiment