Abstract:L'Inventaire d'agitation de Cohen-Mansfield (IACM) évalue la fréquence de 29 comportements difficiles sur une période de deux semaines. Les qualités psychométriques de l'IACM sont documentées mais la structure factorielle de l'instrument chez les personnes résidant en centre d'hébergement reste à confirmer. L'IACM a été complété pour 373 personnes âgées (114 hommes et 259 femmes) de 60 ans ou plus et résidant en centre d'hébergement. Les résultats d'une analyse factorielle confirmatoire portant sur un modèle à trois facteurs démontrent un manque d'adéquation aux données. Les résultats d'une analyse factorielle exploratoire soutiennent une solution comprenant trois composantes (l'agitation physique avec agressivité, l'agitation verbale et l'agitation physique sans agressivité) expliquant 43,8 % de la variance. Cette solution est similaire à celles identifiées dans les études menées précédemment auprès de la même population et avec différentes versions du Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory. Les implications de ces résultats sont discutées.The Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) evaluates the frequency of 29 difficult behaviors over a two-weeks period. The psychometric properties of the French version of the CMAI are known but the factorial structure of this instrument in residents of long-term care facilities remains to be confirmed. The French version of the CMAI was completed for 373 adults (114 men and 259 women) aged 60 years or older and residing in long-term care facilities. The results of a confirmatory factor analysis assessing the overall fit of a three-factors model reveal a poor fit to the data. The results of an exploratory factor analysis support a three-factors solution (physically aggressive agitation, verbal agitation, and physically nonaggressive agitation) explaining 43.8% of the variance. This solution is similar to those identified in previous studies conducted with the same population and different versions of the CMAI. The implications of these results are discussed.

Interrater reliability of the motivation assessment scale: Failure to replicate with aggressive behavior

Reliability analysis of the motivation assessment scale: A failure to replicate

Interrater Reliability of the Motivation Assessment Scale: Another, Closer Look

INTER-INFORMANT AGREEMENT ON THE MOTIVATION ASSESSMENT SCALE: ANOTHER FAILURE TO REPLICATE

The Motivation Assessment Scale: inter-rater reliability and internal consistency in a British sample.

Convergent Reliability and Validity of the Questions About Behavioral Function and the Motivation Assessment Scale: A Replication Study

The Motivation of Stereotypic and Repetitive Behavior: Examination of Construct Validity of the Motivation Assessment Scale

Factor structure of the Motivation Assessment Scale

Factor Structure of the Motivation Assessment Scale for Persons with Mental Retardation

Assessment of the convergent validity of the Questions About Behavioral Function scale with analogue functional analysis and the Motivation Assessment Scale

Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses of the Motivation Assessment Scale and Resident Choice Assessment Scale

A Validation Study of the Mindfulness-Based Interventions Teaching Assessment Criteria for Assessing Mindfulness-Based Intervention Teacher Skill: Inter-Rater Reliability and Predictive Validity

Reliability Generalization of the Triarchic Psychopathy Measure

Thalamic and Ventricular Volumes in Siblings Discordant for Schizophrenia and Normal Controls

Reliability of the Colorado Family Support Assessment

Reliability Generalization of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire: A Meta-Analytic View of Reliability Estimates

Relations Between Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory–A Scales and Rorschach Variables With the Scope and Severity of Maltreatment Among Adolescents

Assessment of Sex Offenders With the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality /Inventory–2–Restructured Form

Cross-informant agreement between caregivers and teachers for prosocial behavior across child welfare settings

The Motivation and Pleasure Scale–Self-Report (MAP-SR): Reliability and validity of a self-report measure of negative symptoms

Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: Implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity.