Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: Implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity.

Thomas M. Achenbach,Stephanie H. McConaughy,Catherine T. Howell
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.213
IF: 22.4
1987-01-01
Psychological Bulletin
Abstract:Our purpose in this article was to determine the degree of consistency between different informants’ reports of the behavioral/emotional problems of subjects aged from 1½ to 19 years. We found 269 samples in 119 studies for meta-analyses of Pearson r s between ratings by parents, teachers, mental health workers, observers, peers, and the subjects themselves. The mean r s between all types of informants were statistically significant. The mean r s were .60 between similar informants (e.g., pairs of parents), .28 between different types of informants (e.g., parent/teacher), and .22 between subjects and other informants. Correlations were significantly higher for 6- to 11-year-olds than for adolescents, and for undercontrolled versus overcontrolled problems, although these differences were not large. The modest correlations between informants indicate that child and adolescent problems are not effectively captured by present-versus-absent judgments of problems. Instead, the variations between reports by different informants argue for assessment in terms of multiple axes designed to reflect the perceived variations in child and adolescent functioning.
psychology, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?