Comparison of stromal vascular fraction cell composition between Coleman fat and extracellular matrix/stromal vascular fraction gel

Xiaoyun Li,Guohong Zhang,Mengmeng Wang,Changhao Lu,Guangping Zhang,Zhehui Chen,Yingchang Ji
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21623945.2024.2360037
2024-06-05
Adipocyte
Abstract:As a mechanically condensed product of Coleman fat, extracellular matrix/stromal vascular fraction gel (ECM/SVF-gel) eliminates adipocytes, concentrates SVF cells, and improves fat graft retention. This study aims to compare SVF cell composition between Coleman fat and ECM/SVF-gel. Matched Coleman fat and ECM/SVF-gel of 28 healthy women were subjected to RNA-seq, followed by functional enrichment and cell-type-specific enrichment analyses, and deconvolution of SVF cell subsets, reconstructing SVF cell composition in the transcriptome level. ECM/SVF-gels had 9 upregulated and 73 downregulated differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Downregulated DEGs were mainly associated with inflammatory and immune responses, and enriched in fat macrophages. M2 macrophages, resting CD4 + memory T cells, M1 macrophages, resting mast cells, and M0 macrophages ranked in the top five most prevalent immune cells in the two groups. The proportions of the principal non-immune cells (e.g., adipose-derived stem cells, pericytes, preadipocytes, microvascular endothelial cells) had no statistical differences between the two groups. Our findings reveal ECM/SVF-gels share the same dominant immune cells beneficial to fat graft survival with Coleman fat, but exhibiting obvious losses of immune cells (especially macrophages), while non-immune cells necessary for adipose regeneration might have no significant loss in ECM/SVF-gels and their biological effects could be markedly enhanced by the ECM/SVF-gel's condensed nature.
endocrinology & metabolism
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper mainly discusses the difference in stromal vascular fraction (SVF) cell composition between Coleman fat and extracellular matrix/stromal vascular fraction gel (ECM/SVF-gel). SVF cells play a crucial role in fat transplantation and consist of various cell types such as stem cells and immune cells. The study compared the SVF cell composition of Coleman fat and ECM/SVF-gel by RNA sequencing and performed functional enrichment and cell type-specific enrichment analysis. The study found 9 upregulated genes and 73 downregulated genes in ECM/SVF-gel. The downregulated genes were mainly associated with inflammation and immune response and enriched in fat macrophages. The most common immune cells in both groups included M2 macrophages, resting CD4+ memory T cells, M1 macrophages, resting adipocytes, and M0 macrophages. The ratio of non-immune cells (such as adipose-derived stem cells, fibroblasts, preadipocytes, and microvascular endothelial cells) did not significantly differ between the two groups. Although ECM/SVF-gel may lose some immune cells, especially macrophages, during the mechanical processing, the non-immune cells essential for fat regeneration may not be significantly reduced. Moreover, under the highly concentrated nature of ECM/SVF-gel, their biological effects may be enhanced. The results of the paper indicate that although ECM/SVF-gel has better retention and tissue integrity after fat transplantation compared to Coleman fat, the changes in the proportion of immune cells may affect the immune microenvironment after fat transplantation. Therefore, optimizing the immune microenvironment of ECM/SVF-gel may be an effective strategy to improve its efficacy.