Abstract:This paper reviews the problems and successes of computing turbulent flow. Most of the flow phenomena that are important to modern technology involve turbulence. The review is concerned with methods for turbulent flow computer predictions and their applications, and describes several of them. These computational methods are aimed at simulating either as much detail of the turbulent motion as possible by current computer power or, more commonly, its overall effect on the mean-flow behaviour. The methods are still being developed and some of the most recent concepts involved are discussed.Some success has been achieved with two-equation models for relatively simple hydrodynamic phenomena; indeed, routine design work has been undertaken during the last three decades in several applications of engineering practise, for which extensive studies have optimised these models.Failures are still common for many applications particularly those that involve strong curvature, intermittency, strong buoyancy influences, low-Reynolds-number effects, rapid compression or expansion, strong swirl, and kinetically-influenced chemical reaction. New conceptual developments are needed in these areas, probably along the lines of actually calculating the principal manifestation of turbulence, e.g. intermittency. A start has been made in this direction in the form of ‘multi-fluid’ models, and full simulations.The turbulence modelling approaches presented here are, Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS), two-fluid models, Very Large Eddy Simulation (VLES), Unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (URANS), Detached Eddy Simulation (DES) and some interesting, relatively recent, hybrid LES/RANS techniques.A large number of relatively recent studies are considered, together with reference to the numerical experiments existing on the subject.The authors hope that they provide the interested reader with most of the appropriate sources of turbulence modelling, exhibiting either as much detail as it is possible, by means of bibliography, or illustrating some of the most recent developments on the numerical modelling of turbulent flows. Thus, the potential user has the appropriate information, for him to select the suitable turbulence model for his own case of interest.

Strategies for turbulence modelling and simulations

Recent advances on the numerical modelling of turbulent flows

Turbulence Approaches for Numerical Predictions of Vehicle-Like Afterbody Vortex Flows

Recent developments and research needs in turbulence modeling of hypersonic flows

A turbulent eddy-viscosity surrogate modeling framework for Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulations

Philosophies and fallacies in turbulence modeling

On the role and challenges of CFD in the aerospace industry

The State of the Art of Hybrid RANS/LES Modeling for the Simulation of Turbulent Flows

On the physical structure, modelling and computation-based prediction of two-dimensional, smooth-wall turbulent boundary layers subjected to streamwise pressure gradients

High-order Large Eddy Simulations of Confined Rotor-Stator Flows

A highly accurate strategy for data-driven turbulence modeling

Numerical prediction of largely separated flows in low-pressure turbine blades with high loading

Uncertainty Quantification in Computational Fluid Dynamics: Physics and Machine Learning Based Approaches

A Mathematical Solution to the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Dilemma

Supersonic Base Flow With and Without Propulsive Jets: A Brief Review

A comparative evaluation of turbulence models for simulation of unsteady cavitating flows

Simulations of Complex Turbulent Flows with RANS-LES Hybrid Approaches

Studies of Transonic Aircraft Flows and Prediction of Initial Buffet Onset Using Large-Eddy Simulations

Numerical Modeling of Freestream Turbulence Decay Using Different Commercial Computational Fluid Dynamics Codes

Developments and applications of hybrid RANS-LES methods for wide-speed-range flows

Anisotropic turbulence modeling of the atmospheric surface layer: Validation of novel model settings and comparison with traditional two-equation models in flows over complex terrain