Abstract:1 Biogeographical models of species’ distributions are essential tools for assessing impacts of changing environmental conditions on natural communities and ecosystems. Practitioners need more reliable predictions to integrate into conservation planning (e.g. reserve design and management). 2 Most models still largely ignore or inappropriately take into account important features of species’ distributions, such as spatial autocorrelation, dispersal and migration, biotic and environmental interactions. Whether distributions of natural communities or ecosystems are better modelled by assembling individual species’ predictions in a bottom‐up approach or modelled as collective entities is another important issue. An international workshop was organized to address these issues. 3 We discuss more specifically six issues in a methodological framework for generalized regression: (i) links with ecological theory; (ii) optimal use of existing data and artificially generated data; (iii) incorporating spatial context; (iv) integrating ecological and environmental interactions; (v) assessing prediction errors and uncertainties; and (vi) predicting distributions of communities or collective properties of biodiversity. 4 Synthesis and applications. Better predictions of the effects of impacts on biological communities and ecosystems can emerge only from more robust species’ distribution models and better documentation of the uncertainty associated with these models. An improved understanding of causes of species’ distributions, especially at their range limits, as well as of ecological assembly rules and ecosystem functioning, is necessary if further progress is to be made. A better collaborative effort between theoretical and functional ecologists, ecological modellers and statisticians is required to reach these goals. Biogeographical models of species’ distributions are essential tools for assessing impacts of changing environmental conditions on natural communities and ecosystems. Practitioners need more reliable predictions to integrate into conservation planning (e.g. reserve design and management). Most models still largely ignore or inappropriately take into account important features of species’ distributions, such as spatial autocorrelation, dispersal and migration, biotic and environmental interactions. Whether distributions of natural communities or ecosystems are better modelled by assembling individual species’ predictions in a bottom‐up approach or modelled as collective entities is another important issue. An international workshop was organized to address these issues. We discuss more specifically six issues in a methodological framework for generalized regression: (i) links with ecological theory; (ii) optimal use of existing data and artificially generated data; (iii) incorporating spatial context; (iv) integrating ecological and environmental interactions; (v) assessing prediction errors and uncertainties; and (vi) predicting distributions of communities or collective properties of biodiversity. Synthesis and applications. Better predictions of the effects of impacts on biological communities and ecosystems can emerge only from more robust species’ distribution models and better documentation of the uncertainty associated with these models. An improved understanding of causes of species’ distributions, especially at their range limits, as well as of ecological assembly rules and ecosystem functioning, is necessary if further progress is to be made. A better collaborative effort between theoretical and functional ecologists, ecological modellers and statisticians is required to reach these goals.

Top ten hazards to avoid when modeling species distributions: a didactic guide of assumptions, problems, and recommendations

Common mistakes in ecological niche models

Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology

Species-Distribution Modeling: Advantages and Limitations of Its Application. 1. General Approaches

The shadow model: how and why small choices in spatially explicit species distribution models affect predictions

Making better biogeographical predictions of species' distributions

Big data, big problems? How to circumvent problems in biodiversity mapping and ensure meaningful results

Dealing with overprediction in species distribution models: How adding distance constraints can improve model accuracy

Some Noteworthy Issues in Joint Species Distribution Modeling for Plant Data

A New Method for Low Density Distribution Modeling and Near Threatened Species: The Study Case of Plectrohyla Guatemalensis

Structural Uncertainty in Models Projecting the Consequences of Habitat Loss and Fragmentation on Biodiversity

What does ecological modelling model? A proposed classification of ecological niche models based on their underlying methods

Assessing Habitat Suitability Models for the Deep Sea: Is Our Ability to Predict the Distributions of Seafloor Fauna Improving?

Want to model a species niche? A step-by-step guideline on correlative ecological niche modelling

Ecological niche models and species distribution models in marine environments: A literature review and spatial analysis of evidence

Evaluating Potential Distribution of High‐Risk Aquatic Invasive Species in the Water Garden and Aquarium Trade at a Global Scale Based on Current Established Populations

Gaps and opportunities in modelling human influence on species distributions in the Anthropocene

A new distributional model coupling environmental and biotic factors

The interplay of various sources of noise on reliability of species distribution models hinges on ecological specialisation

A quixotic view of spatial bias in modelling the distribution of species and their diversity

Evaluation metrics and validation of presence-only species distribution models based on distributional maps with varying coverage