Abstract:1 Biogeographical models of species’ distributions are essential tools for assessing impacts of changing environmental conditions on natural communities and ecosystems. Practitioners need more reliable predictions to integrate into conservation planning (e.g. reserve design and management). 2 Most models still largely ignore or inappropriately take into account important features of species’ distributions, such as spatial autocorrelation, dispersal and migration, biotic and environmental interactions. Whether distributions of natural communities or ecosystems are better modelled by assembling individual species’ predictions in a bottom‐up approach or modelled as collective entities is another important issue. An international workshop was organized to address these issues. 3 We discuss more specifically six issues in a methodological framework for generalized regression: (i) links with ecological theory; (ii) optimal use of existing data and artificially generated data; (iii) incorporating spatial context; (iv) integrating ecological and environmental interactions; (v) assessing prediction errors and uncertainties; and (vi) predicting distributions of communities or collective properties of biodiversity. 4 Synthesis and applications. Better predictions of the effects of impacts on biological communities and ecosystems can emerge only from more robust species’ distribution models and better documentation of the uncertainty associated with these models. An improved understanding of causes of species’ distributions, especially at their range limits, as well as of ecological assembly rules and ecosystem functioning, is necessary if further progress is to be made. A better collaborative effort between theoretical and functional ecologists, ecological modellers and statisticians is required to reach these goals. Biogeographical models of species’ distributions are essential tools for assessing impacts of changing environmental conditions on natural communities and ecosystems. Practitioners need more reliable predictions to integrate into conservation planning (e.g. reserve design and management). Most models still largely ignore or inappropriately take into account important features of species’ distributions, such as spatial autocorrelation, dispersal and migration, biotic and environmental interactions. Whether distributions of natural communities or ecosystems are better modelled by assembling individual species’ predictions in a bottom‐up approach or modelled as collective entities is another important issue. An international workshop was organized to address these issues. We discuss more specifically six issues in a methodological framework for generalized regression: (i) links with ecological theory; (ii) optimal use of existing data and artificially generated data; (iii) incorporating spatial context; (iv) integrating ecological and environmental interactions; (v) assessing prediction errors and uncertainties; and (vi) predicting distributions of communities or collective properties of biodiversity. Synthesis and applications. Better predictions of the effects of impacts on biological communities and ecosystems can emerge only from more robust species’ distribution models and better documentation of the uncertainty associated with these models. An improved understanding of causes of species’ distributions, especially at their range limits, as well as of ecological assembly rules and ecosystem functioning, is necessary if further progress is to be made. A better collaborative effort between theoretical and functional ecologists, ecological modellers and statisticians is required to reach these goals.

A quixotic view of spatial bias in modelling the distribution of species and their diversity

Sampling Biases Shape Our View of the Natural World

Controlling the effects of sampling bias in biodiversity models

Bias correction in species distribution models based on geographic and environmental characteristics

Demystifying Spatial Confounding

Dealing with overprediction in species distribution models: How adding distance constraints can improve model accuracy

No optimal spatial filtering distance for mitigating sampling bias in ecological niche models

Making better biogeographical predictions of species' distributions

Spatiotemporal modelling of abundance from multiple data sources in an integrated spatial distribution model

Effective strategies for correcting spatial sampling bias in species distribution models without independent test data

Hyperparameter tuning and performance assessment of statistical and machine-learning algorithms using spatial data

On the impact of preferential sampling on ecological status and trend assessment

Perceived and observed biases within scientific communities: a case study in movement ecology

A Conceptual Framework for the Spatial Analysis of Functional Trait Diversity

Disturbance Effects on Spatial Autocorrelation in Biodiversity: an Overview and a Call for Study

Spatial predictions at the community level: from current approaches to future frameworks

Causes and effects of sampling bias on marine Western Atlantic biodiversity knowledge

Measuring metrics: what diversity indicators are most appropriate for different forms of data bias?

Dealing with area‐to‐point spatial misalignment in species distribution models

Effects of publication bias on conservation planning

The shadow model: how and why small choices in spatially explicit species distribution models affect predictions