'Not seeing people as capable': Disability professionals' mis/understandings of ableism

Carli Friedman,Laura VanPuymbrouck,Zach Gordon
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.13218
2024-02-27
Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
Abstract:Abstract Background Knowledge about how disability professionals understand ableism may provide insight into the production of inequalities. The aim of this study was to examine how disability professionals understand ableism. Methods We asked 347 disability professionals, all of whom worked with people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, among other populations, to define ableism and then analysed those definitions using content analysis. Results The themes about how participants understood ableism were: discrimination; differential treatment; individualization; norms and othering; ableist language; microaggressions; and systems and environments. It was also not uncommon for participants to say ableist things, and express misconceptions in their definitions. This included these themes: avoiding disability; using ableist language; framing disability as in/ability; centring people without disabilities; ignoring invisible disabilities; believing only people without disabilities have bias; and believing ableism does not exist. Conclusions Knowing disability professionals' understandings of ableism is necessary to intervene biased attitudes and reduce ableism.
rehabilitation,psychology, educational
What problem does this paper attempt to address?