When usual care is not so usual: protocol violations and generalisability in a treat‐to‐target strategy trial in axial spondyloarthritis

Clementina López‐Medina,Filip Van Den Bosch,Désirée Van Der Heijde,Maxime Dougados,Anna Molto
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25387
2024-06-26
Arthritis Care & Research
Abstract:Objective The objective was to evaluate the impact of protocol violations in the treat‐to‐target (T2T) group in the TICOSPA trial and to compare the proportion of patients optimally treated according to the ASAS/EULAR 2016 recommendations for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) between the T2T vs. usual care (UC) arms. Methods Cluster‐randomized, controlled 48‐week (48W) trial including patients with axSpA fulfilling the ASAS criteria, ASDAS>2.1 and bDMARD‐naïve. Eighteen axSpA expert centers were randomly allocated to one treatment arm: a)T2T: prespecified management strategy (4W visits); b)UC: treatment decisions at the rheumatologist's discretion (12W visits). Protocol violations in the T2T arm and the fulfilment of the 2016 ASAS/EULAR recommendations in both arms were evaluated at every visit. ASAS‐HI and disease activity outcomes at 48W were compared between T2T violators vs. non‐violators. Patients treated according to the ASAS/EULAR recommendations were compared between both arms. Results 160 patients initiated the trial (80 T2T;80 UC). In the T2T arm, 51.2% patients violated the protocol at least once (62.2% of violations resulting in maintenance/reduction of treatment against protocol). After 48W, T2T violators vs. non‐violators showed similar ratios of ASAS‐HI improvement. The proportion of patients managed according to the ASAS/EULAR recommendations after the first 12W were 63.9% vs. 61.8% for T2T and UC arms, respectively. Conclusion Protocol violations in the T2T arm in the TICOSPA trial were frequent, although they did not have an impact on the rate of the primary outcome. The UC group was optimally treated partly explaining the non‐achievement of the primary objective in the TICOSPA trial.
rheumatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?