Stricter treat-to-target in RA does not result in less radiographic progression: a longitudinal analysis in RA BIODAM

Sofia Ramiro,Robert Landewé,Désirée van der Heijde,Alexandre Sepriano,Oliver FitzGerald,Mikkel Østergaard,Joanne Homik,Ori Elkayam,J Carter Thorne,Maggie J Larché,Gianfranco Ferraccioli,Marina Backhaus,Gilles Boire,Bernard Combe,Thierry Schaeverbeke,Alain Saraux,Maxime Dougados,Maurizio Rossini,Marcello Govoni,Luigi Sinigaglia,Alain G Cantagrel,Cornelia F Allaart,Cheryl Barnabe,Clifton O Bingham,Dirkjan van Schaardenburg,Hilde B Hammer,Rana Dadashova,Edna Hutchings,Joel Paschke,Walter P Maksymowych

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kead021

2023-09-01

Abstract:Objectives: To investigate whether meticulously following a treat-to-target (T2T)-strategy in daily clinical practice will lead to less radiographic progression in patients with active RA who start (new) DMARD-therapy. Methods: Patients with RA from 10 countries starting/changing conventional synthetic or biologic DMARDs because of active RA, and in whom treatment intensification according to the T2T principle was pursued, were assessed for disease activity every 3 months for 2 years (RA-BIODAM cohort). The primary outcome was the change in Sharp-van der Heijde (SvdH) score, assessed every 6 months. Per 3-month interval DAS44-T2T could be followed zero, one or two times (in a total of two visits). The relation between T2T intensity and change in SvdH-score was modelled by generalized estimating equations. Results: In total, 511 patients were included [mean (s.d.) age: 56 (13) years; 76% female]. Mean 2-year SvdH progression was 2.2 (4.1) units (median: 1 unit). A stricter application of T2T in a 3-month interval did not reduce progression in the same 6-month interval [parameter estimates (for yes vs no): +0.15 units (95% CI: -0.04, 0.33) for 2 vs 0 visits; and +0.08 units (-0.06; 0.22) for 1 vs 0 visits] nor did it reduce progression in the subsequent 6-month interval. Conclusions: In this daily practice cohort, following T2T principles more meticulously did not result in less radiographic progression than a somewhat more lenient attitude towards T2T. One possible interpretation of these results is that the intention to apply T2T already suffices and that a more stringent approach does not further improve outcome.