Predator selection on phenotypic variability of cryptic and aposematic moths

Ossi Nokelainen,Sanni A. Silvasti,Sharon Y. Strauss,Niklas Wahlberg,Johanna Mappes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-45329-5

IF: 16.6

2024-02-24

Nature Communications

Abstract:Natural selection generally favours phenotypic variability in camouflaged organisms, whereas aposematic organisms are expected to evolve a more uniform warning coloration. However, no comprehensive analysis of the phenotypic consequences of predator selection in aposematic and cryptic species exists. Using state-of-the-art image analysis, we examine 2800 wing images of 82 moth species accessed via three online museum databases. We test whether anti-predator strategy (i.e., camouflage or aposematism) explains intraspecific variation in wing colour and pattern across northern hemisphere moths. In addition, we test two mutually non-exclusive, ecological hypotheses to explain variation in colour pattern: diel-activity or dietary-niche. In this work, taking into account phylogenetic relationships, moth phenotypic variability is best explained by anti-predator strategy with camouflaged moths being more variable in wing patterning than aposematic species.

multidisciplinary sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper aims to explore the impact of predator selection on the phenotypic variation of camouflage and aposematism moths. Specifically, the researchers analyzed 2,800 wing images from 82 moth species to examine whether anti - predator strategies (i.e., camouflage or aposematism), diurnal - activity patterns, or dietary niches can explain the intraspecific variation in the wing color and pattern of these moths. The main questions of the study are:

1. **Anti - predator strategies**: Are there differences in the intraspecific variation in wing color and pattern between camouflage moths and aposematism moths?
2. **Diurnal - activity patterns**: Are there differences in the intraspecific variation in wing color and pattern among moths with different activity times (e.g., diurnal, nocturnal)?
3. **Dietary niches**: Are there differences in the intraspecific variation in wing color and pattern among moths with different dietary preferences (e.g., monophagous, polyphagous)?

The researchers used state - of - the - art image - analysis techniques to obtain a large number of moth - wing images from three online museum databases and controlled the phylogenetic relationships of moths to evaluate the impact of these factors on wing - phenotypic variation.

### Main Conclusions
- **Anti - predator strategies**: The study found that the degree of variation in the wing patterns of camouflage moths was significantly higher than that of aposematism moths. This result supports the classical theoretical prediction that camouflage organisms should have higher phenotypic variation to cope with the formation of predator search images.
- **Diurnal - activity patterns**: The intraspecific variation in the size of the wing patterns of nocturnal moths is greater than that of diurnal and crepuscular moths. This indicates that nocturnal moths may face weaker selection pressures, resulting in more diverse wing patterns.
- **Dietary niches**: Dietary preferences have a weak explanatory power for wing - phenotypic variation, and no significant supporting evidence was found.

### Formulas
The statistical analysis methods mentioned in the paper include analysis of variance (ANOVA) and coefficient of variation (CV). The specific formulas are as follows:

- **Coefficient of variation (CV)**:
\[
\text{CV}=\frac{\sigma}{\mu}\times100\%
\]
where \(\sigma\) is the standard deviation and \(\mu\) is the mean.

- **Analysis of variance (ANOVA)**:
\[
F = \frac{\text{MS}_{\text{between}}}{\text{MS}_{\text{within}}}
\]
where \(\text{MS}_{\text{between}}\) is the between - group mean square and \(\text{MS}_{\text{within}}\) is the within - group mean square.

### Discussion
The research results support the classical hypothesis that camouflage moths have higher phenotypic variation than aposematism moths. However, this difference is mainly reflected in pattern characteristics rather than color characteristics. This may be because predators' recognition of patterns is more common than that of colors and is not affected by differences in the predators' visual systems.

In addition, the study also found that nocturnal moths have a higher degree of variation in their wing patterns. This may be because when nocturnal moths rest during the day, their wing patterns are less exposed to visual predators, and thus they are under less selection pressure.

In conclusion, this study provides important empirical support for understanding how predator selection affects the phenotypic variation of moths and lays the foundation for further exploration of the evolutionary mechanisms of anti - predator strategies.