Comparative study on energy-saving performance of single- and two-stage evaporative-cooling condenser systems

Yang Yang,Jun Zeng,Boyu Yang,Linmao Yin,Tianyou He
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2024.02.013
IF: 4.14
2024-02-14
International Journal of Refrigeration
Abstract:The mechanical vapor compression system (MVC) coupled with the evaporative-cooling condenser is an effective method to improve its high temperature adaptability. However, this hybrid systems typically use an evaporative cooler as a single-stage pre-cooling unit of condenser and is mainly designed for hot-dry climates. In this paper, based on conventional evaporative-cooling condenser configuration, three two-stage evaporative-cooling condenser systems (MVC-TSEC(A), MVC-TSEC(B) and MVC-TSEC(C)) were proposed. The MVC-TSEC(A) consists of one condenser and an indirect/direct evaporative-cooler. The MVC-TSEC(B) and MVC-TSEC(C) have two condensers (in series), which are coupled with a two-stage evaporative cooling system. The refrigerant in the MVC-TSEC(C) forms a counter-flow configuration with the outdoor air, while it is concurrent flow in MVC-TSEC(B). Subsequently, the effects of the ambient parameters and outdoor air flowrate on the three two-stage hybrid systems were analyzed comparatively based on detailed numerical models. Finally, the application potential of these hybrid systems was evaluated comprehensively in hot-humid climates. The results showed that the seasonal COP and energy-saving rate for the MVC-TSEC(C) are reached by 4.2−4.7 and 12.7−21.1%, respectively. Moreover, the static equipment payback period of the three two-stage hybrid systems are 3.8, 3.3 and 3.0 years, respectively.
engineering, mechanical,thermodynamics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?