Abstract:The present paper reports an experiment with a two-year-delayed (M = 695 days) follow-up that tests an approach to raising willingness to take political and personal climate actions. Many Americans still do not view climate change as a threat requiring urgent action. Moreover, among American conservatives, higher science literacy is paradoxically associated with higher anthropogenic climate-change skepticism. Our experimental materials were designed to harness the power of two central cognitive constraints - coherence and causal invariance, which map onto two narrative proclivities that anthropologists have identified as universal - to promote climate action across the political spectrum. Towards that goal, the essential role of these constraints in the causal-belief-formation process predicts that climate-change information would be more persuasive when it is embedded in a personal climate-action narrative, the evocation of which can benefit from exposure to parsimonious scientific explanations of indisputable everyday observations, juxtaposed with reasoners' own, typically less coherent explanations, occurring in a context that engages their moral stance. Our brief one-time intervention, conducted in ten U.S. states with the highest level of climate skepticism, showed that across the political spectrum, our materials raised appreciation of science, openness to alternative views, and willingness to take climate actions in the immediate assessment. It also raised how likely were reports two years later of having taken those actions or would have taken them had the opportunity existed, suggesting a long-lasting effect. Our approach adopts the framework that conceptions of reality are representations, and adaptive solutions in that infinite space of representations require cognitive constraints to narrow the search.

Patience and climate change mitigation: Global evidence

Future Orientation Promotes Climate Concern and Mitigation

Differentiated Responsibilities and Prosocial Behavior in Climate Change Mitigation: Behavioral Evidence from the United States and China

Support for Climate Change Policy: Social Psychological and Social Structural Influences*

Climate change and the UN-2030 agenda: Do mitigation technologies represent a driving factor? New evidence from OECD economies

Globally representative evidence on the actual and perceived support for climate action

Complexity, economic science and possible economic benefits of climate change mitigation policy

Cognition Research on Global Climate Change

European Climate Change Perceptions: Public support for mitigation and adaptation policies

Tackling climate change through energy efficiency: mathematical models for evidence-based public policy recommendations

Climate decision making: influence of prevailing social norms and probability of climate change

The Climate Decade: Changing Attitudes on Three Continents

Willingness-to-Pay for Climate Change Mitigation: Evidence from China

Assessing the impact of costly punishment and group size in collective-risk climate dilemmas

Global Climate Policy Effectiveness Analysis: Evidence from 49 Countries, 1951-2018

Individuals' and Households' Climate Adaptation and Mitigation Behaviors: A Systematic Review

Demand-side solutions to climate change mitigation consistent with high levels of well-being

Promoting climate actions: A cognitive-constraints approach

Exploring the Adaptation-mitigation Relationship: Does Information on the Costs of Adapting to Climate Change Influence Support for Mitigation?

Individualist–Collectivist Differences in Climate Change Inaction: the Role of Perceived Intractability

Determinants of Climate Change Mitigation Technology Portfolio: an Empirical Study of Major U.S. Firms