Abstract:Climate change is one of the most urgent issues that the whole world is facing.The "knowledge deficit theory",which has been used as the basis for government policy-making for many decades,is criticized for being too simple.Recently,some scholars put forward a new idea that there might be a link between one's metacognition of climate change and his/her pro-environmental attitude and behaviour(Scannell & Grouzet,2010).Based on their and Petty's classification of metacognition,this article reviews recent studies and theories in four dimensions:the confidence in one's knowledge level about climate change risk(metacognition knowledge),the judgment one makes about where his/her ideas of climate change risk come from(metacognition origin),the judgment of the likelihood of a given climate change outcome(metacognition certainty) and the weight or importance one places on the cognition of climate change (metacognition importance) and finds;(1) There is often a mismatch between the public's actual knowledge and their metacognition knowledge.A lot of people,who are more or less overconfident in their knowledge level about climate change,may engage in actions which they believe are helpful but objectively are not,and hesitate to make further information-seeking effort.(2) Since climate change is a statistic trend,it is too hard to be detected by one's personal experience,most people learn about this kind of risk from climate scientists and their social amplifier's description,so the public's risk perception is mainly oriented by the analytic system rather than the experience system.The analytic system,which requires justification via logic and evidence,cannot create a sense of urgency and are unlikely to motivate immediate actions;and virtual reality technology used in some disaster movies does activate the experience system, but their effects still remain to be elucidated.(3) While reading climate change reports,people usually pay more attention to the gist of the information instead of details,so they would be insensitive to the increased degree of certainty.At the same time,mass media's discontinuance reports and "balanced" reporting journalistic norm also reduce the public's certainty of climate change risk.(4) People generally consider climate change an event that will happen in the future and on the other side of the world,so they construe it in more terms and have most cognitive resources allocated to the present event.According to the theory of discounting,people usually have a strong present bias,they strongly prefer immediate benefits and dislike present costs relative to delayed options,so the future benefit of pro-environmental behavior is discounted.In this way,the metacognition importance of climate change is diminished when compared with other current events.All these metacognitive elements become psychological barriers standing in the way of behavior change that would help to limit CO_2 emission,no wonder over years the overall condition of climate change has not changed much.Finally, the future trends of research on metacognition of climate change risk are discussed.How to make full use of the fruitful achievements in the metacognition field to promote the public's pro-environmental behaviour is of great importance.

How Political Ideology Affects Climate Perception: Moderation Effects of Time Orientation and Knowledge

The Moderating Role of Age in the Effect of Video Playback Speed on Urgency Perception in the Context of Climate Change

The influence of partisan news on climate mitigation support: An investigation into the mediating role of perceived risk and efficacy

How and when higher climate change risk perception promotes less climate change inaction

The influence of risk perception on climate change communication behavior: a dual perspective of psychological distance and environmental values

A Study of American Response to Climate Change and the Influence of Carbon Dependency, Social Capital, and Political Orientation

The effect of different extreme weather events on attitudes toward climate change

More is not always better: the role of Social Media Information in shaping individual low-carbon behavioral intention

Future Orientation Promotes Climate Concern and Mitigation

Their Economy and Our Health: Communicating Climate Change to the Divided American Public

Is social media more conducive to climate change communication behavior? The mediating role of risk perception and environmental values

Extreme weather experience and climate change risk perceptions: the roles of partisanship and climate change cause attribution

The Politicization of Climate Science: Media Consumption, Perceptions of Science and Scientists, and Support for Policy

What Framework Promotes Saliency of Climate Change Issues on Online Public Agenda: A Quantitative Study of Online Knowledge Community Quora

A Research on Climate Change Risk from a Metacognitive Perspective

Does Political Propaganda Matter in Mitigating Climate Change? Insights from the United States of America

Political ideology affects energy-efficiency attitudes and choices

Six minutes to promote change: People, not facts, alter students' perceptions on climate change

The Influence of Political Ideology and Socioeconomic Vulnerability on Perceived Health Risks of Heat Waves in the Context of Climate Change

Fast or Slow System: How Does Information Exposure Affect Individual Climate Change Mitigation Responses?

The Influence of Political Ideology on Greenhouse Gas Emissions