Eligibility to COAPT trial in the daily practice: A real‐world experience

Edoardo Zancanaro,Nicola Buzzatti,Paolo Denti,Nicolò Azzola Guicciardi,Enrico Melillo,Fabrizio Monaco,Eustachio Agricola,Francesco Ancona,Ottavio Alfieri,Michele De Bonis,Francesco Maisano
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31124
IF: 2.3
2024-06-25
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Abstract:Background The COAPT Trial was the first ever to demonstrate a survival benefit in treating functional mitral regurgitation (FMR). That was achieved through transcatheter mitral repair in selected patients. The exact proportion of patients fulfilling COAPT selection criteria in the real‐world is unknown. Aims To assess the applicability of COAPT criteria in real world and its impact on patients' survival. Methods We assessed the clinical data and follow‐up results of all consecutive patients admitted for FMR at our Department between January 2016 and May 2021 according to COAPT eligibility. COAPT eligibility was retrospectively assessed by a cardiac surgeon and a cardiologist. Results Among 394 patients, 56 (14%) were COAPT eligible. The most frequent reasons for exclusion were MR ≤ 2 (22%), LVEF 50% (19%), and non‐optimized GDMT (21.3%). Among Non‐COAPT patients, weighted 4‐year survival was higher in patients who received MitraClip compared to those who were left in optimized medical therapy (91.5% confidence interval [CI: 0.864, 0.96] vs. 71.8% [CI: 0.509, 0.926], respectively, p = 0.027). Conclusions Only a minority (14%) of real‐world patients with FMR referred to a tertiary hospital fulfilled the COAPT selection criteria. Among Non‐COAPT patients, weighted 4‐year survival was higher in patients who received MitraClip compared to those who were left in optimized medical therapy (91.5% [0.864, 0.96] vs. 71.8% [0.509, 0.926], respectively, p = 0.027).
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?