Impact of heart failure hospitalizations on clinical outcomes after mitral transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair: Results from the EXPAND study

Mirjam Kessler,Wolfgang Rottbauer,Ralph Stephan von Bardeleben,Carmelo Grasso,Philipp Lurz,Paul Mahoney,Matthew Price,Mathew Williams,Paolo Denti,Rodrigo Estevez‐Loureiro,Saibal Kar,Francesco Maisano
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3250
2024-05-12
European Journal of Heart Failure
Abstract:In the EXPAND study, subjects with prior heart failure hospitalizations had an increased incidence of all‐cause mortality at 1 year. Associations with 1‐year heart failure hospitalization after mitral transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair included residual MR ≥2+ at discharge, HFH in the year prior to treatment with the MitraClip system, baseline NYHA class ≥III, baseline TR ≥2+, and baseline LVEF ≤40.0%. CI, confidence interval; HFH, heart failure hospitalization; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MR, mitral regurgitation; NYHA, New York Heart Association; OR, odds ratio; TR, tricuspid regurgitation. Aim This analysis aimed to compare the clinical outcomes associated with heart failure (HF) readmissions and to identify associations with HF hospitalizations (HFH) in patients treated with the MitraClipTM NTR/XTR System in the EXPAND study. Methods and results The global, real‐world EXPAND study enrolled 1041 patients with primary or secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) treated with the MitraClip NTR/XTR System. Echocardiograms were analysed by an independent echocardiographic core laboratory. The study population was stratified into HFH and No‐HFH groups based on the occurrence of HFH 1 year post‐index procedure. Clinical outcomes including MR severity, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) score, and all‐cause mortality were compared (HFH: n = 181; No‐HFH: n = 860). Both groups achieved consistent 1‐year MR reduction to ≤1+ (HFH vs. No‐HFH: 87.3% vs. 89.5%, p = 0.6) and significant 1‐year improvement in KCCQ scores (+16.5 vs. +22.3, p = 0.09) and NYHA functional class. However, more patients in the No‐HFH group had 1‐year NYHA class ≤II (HFH vs. No‐HFH: 67.9% vs. 81.9%, p
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?