The lack of head-to-head randomised trials and the consequences for patients and national health service: The case of non-small cell lung cancer

Ruggero Lasala,Alessia Romagnoli,Fiorenzo Santoleri,Valentina Isgrò,Corrado Confalonieri,Alberto Costantini,Fiorenza Enrico,Gianluca Russo,Piera Polidori,Alessandra Di Paolo,Francesco Malorgio,Giordano Beretta,Felice Musicco
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-024-03628-2
2024-01-21
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Abstract:To introduce a drug to the market, it's not mandatory for it to be more effective and safer than the current treatment for the same condition. Consequently, head-to-head studies between the two best treatments for the same condition are not required, and this could result in a lack of information for patients, clinicians, and decision-makers. This study aims to evaluate the presence of head-to-head studies among the drugs used for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
pharmacology & pharmacy
What problem does this paper attempt to address?